A picture is worth a thousand words: Electronic cigarette content on Instagram and Pinterest
More details
Hide details
University of Louisville
Joy L. Hart   

University of Louisville, Dept of Communication, Louisville, Ky 40292, United States.
Publish date: 2017-07-03
Submission date: 2017-02-16
Final revision date: 2017-05-20
Acceptance date: 2017-06-12
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2017;3(July):119
This study examined electronic cigarette (e-cig) content in visual materials posted on the social-media platforms Instagram and Pinterest. Both platforms allow users to upload pictures to the internet and share them globally. Users can search for pictures tagged with specific keywords and phrases.

Using content analysis, this study identified themes in image postings of e-cigs on social media. During five weeks of data collection, keywords were used to identify pictures related to e-cigs. These pictures were then coded into one or more categories.

The three most popular categories for Instagram posts were marketing, customization and juices/flavors. The three most popular categories for Pinterest posts were customization, marketing and memes.

Because of the persuasive power of visuals, it is important to examine communication on Instagram and Pinterest as well as the specific visual messages communicated. Stores and manufacturers use these and similar platforms to communicate with users and potential users; thus it seems that marketers are capitalizing on opportunities for persuasive appeal. The results highlight the popularity of e-cig content on these two social media platforms and reveal an emphasis on marketing and customization.

Noel JK, Rees VW, and Connolly GN: Electronic cigarettes: a new ‘tobacco’ industry. Tob Control 2011, 20(1): 81. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.038562.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Vaporizers, e-cigarettes, and other electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). Tobacco Products, 2016. Retrieved from
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. E-cigarette use triples among middle and high school students in just one year. CDC Newsroom, 2015. Available at: (accessed June 2017).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. E-cigarette use more than doubles among U.S. middle and high school students from 2011-2012. CDC Newsroom, 2015. Available at: (accessed February 2017).
Singh T, Arrazola RA, Corey CG, et al: Tobacco use among middle and high school students — United States, 2011–2015. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016, 65(14): 361–367. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6514a1.
Regan AK, Promoff G, Dube SR, and Arrazola R: Electronic nicotine delivery systems: adult use and awareness of the 'e-cigarette' in the USA. Tob Control 2011 22(1): 19-23. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050044.
CDC, “Quick stats: cigarette smoking status among current adult e-cigarette users, by age group—National Health Interview Survey, United States, 2015,” Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016, 65(42): 1177. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6542a7.
Loomis BR, Rogers T, King BA, Dench, DL, Gammons DG, Fulmer EB, and Agaku IT: National and state-specific sales and prices for electronic cigarettes-U.S., 2012-2013. Am J Prev Med 2016, 50(1): 18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.05.003.
Sears SG, Walker KL, Hart JL, Lee AS, Siu A, and Smith C: Clean, cheap, convenient: promotion of electronic cigarettes on YouTube. Tob Prev Cessation 2017, 3: 10. doi: 10.18332/tpc/69393.
Luo C, Zheng X, Zeng DD, and Leischow S: Portrayal of electronic cigarettes on YouTube. BMC Public Health 2014, 14: 1028. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1028.
Callahan-Lyon P: Electronic cigarettes: human health effects. Tob Control 2014, 23: 36-40. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051470.
Etter J, Bullen C, Flouris AD, Laugesen M, and Eisenberg T: Electronic nicotine delivery systems: a research agenda. Tob Control 2011, 20(3): 243-248. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.042168.
Caponnetto P, Campagna D, Papale G, Russo C, and Polosa R: The emerging phenomenon of electronic cigarettes. Expert Rev of Respir Med 2012, 6: 63-74. doi: 10.1586/ers.11.92.
Cole-Lewis H, Pugatch J, Sanders A, Varghese A, Posada S, Yun C, Schwarz M, and Augustson E: Social listening: a content analysis of e-cigarette discussions on Twitter. J of Med Internet Res 2015(10), 17: 243. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4969.
Chu K, Unger JB, Cruz TB, and Soto D: Electronic cigarettes on Twitter – Spreading the appeal of flavors. Tob Regul Sci 2015, 1: 36-41. doi: 10.18001/TRS.1.1.4.
Huang J, Kornfield R, Szczypka G, and Emery SL: A cross-sectional examination of marketing of electronic cigarettes on Twitter. Tob Control 2014, 23(Suppl 3): 26-30. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051551.
Prochaska JJ, Pechmann C, Kim R, and Leonhardt JM: Twitter=Quitter? an analysis of Twitter quit smoking social networks. Tob Control 2012, 21(4):447-449. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.042507.
Laestadius LI, Wahl MM, and Cho YI: #Vapelife: An exploratory study of electronic cigarette use and promotion on Instagram. Subst Use Misuse 2016, 51(12): 1669-1673. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2016.1188958.
Mayring P: Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2000, 1. Available at: http://www.qualitative-researc... (accessed February 2017).
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Candy and fruit flavored cigarettes now illegal in United States; Step is first under new tobacco law. News & Events, 2009. Available at: (accessed February 2017).
The messages presented in electronic cigarette related social media promotions and discussions: A scoping review (Preprint)
Kahlia McCausland, Bruce Maycock, Tama Leaver, Jonine Jancey
Journal of Medical Internet Research
From Apple to Werewolf: A content analysis of marketing for e-liquids on Instagram
Linnea I. Laestadius, Megan M. Wahl, Pallav Pokhrel, Young I. Cho
Addictive Behaviors
The Messages Presented in Electronic Cigarette–Related Social Media Promotions and Discussion: Scoping Review (Preprint)
Kahlia McCausland, Bruce Maycock, Tama Leaver, Jonine Jancey
#Pugua: An Instagram-based study to understand betel nut use culture in Micronesia (Preprint)
Wayne Buente, Francis Dalisay, Pallav Pokhrel, Hanae Kramer, Ian Pagano