RESEARCH PAPER
Innovative call emerging from a qualitative study for workplace designated stop-smoking area
Marie Chan Sun 1  
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Mauritius, Réduit, Mauritius
2
Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Marie Chan Sun   

University of Mauritius, Réduit, Mauritius
Publication date: 2020-02-03
Submission date: 2019-08-20
Final revision date: 2019-11-06
Acceptance date: 2019-12-03
 
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2020;6(February):9
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Designated smoking areas (DSAs) have become a common feature of public places in various developed and developing countries that have ratified the World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). However, this situation is not in line with the WHO FCTC. In this context, this study was designed to explore the perception of stakeholders on the DSA prevailing in workplaces in Mauritius and to explore the feasibility of smoking cessation interventions in the workplace.

Methods:
A qualitative study using semi-structured, face-to-face interviews was conducted among the various stakeholders in tobacco control in Mauritius. Data collected were transcribed verbatim for analysis.

Results:
Three main themes emerged from this study: 1) a need for comprehensive smoke-free law, 2) a need for smoking cessation services, and 3) a need for stakeholders’ involvement (local government, employers, and health professionals) in the promotion of tobacco cessation programs.

Conclusions:
We make a call for a workplace Designated Stop Smoking Area (DSSA) in order to phase out existing DSAs. DSSAs will be a therapeutic means to divert smokers away from DSAs, in order to change their behaviour with respect to tobacco use. Group therapy, individual counselling, and tobacco treatment will be made accessible in these DSSAs, which with a touch of innovation can become a VIP lounge for stop-smoking services. This innovative call for DSSAs is meant to sensitize policy makers of developing countries on how to proceed for the elimination of DSAs.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none was reported.
FUNDING
There was no source of funding for this research.
PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW
Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
 
REFERENCES (28)
1.
World Health Organization. Health is a fundamental human right. https://www.who.int/mediacentr.... Published December 10, 2017. Accessed March 25, 2019.
 
2.
World Health Organization. World health statistics 2018: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. World health statistics 2018. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; https://www.who.int/gho/public.... Accessed March 25, 2019.
 
3.
World Health Organization. Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003. https://www.who.int/fctc/text_.... Accessed March 25, 2019.
 
4.
Kaufman MR, Merritt AP, Rimbatmaja R, Cohen JE. ‘Excuse me, sir. Please don’t smoke here’. A qualitative study of social enforcement of smoke-free policies in Indonesia. Health Policy Plan. 2015;30(8):995-1002. doi:10.1093/heapol/czu103
 
5.
World Health Organization. The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: 10 years of implementation in the African Region. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2015. https://www.afro.who.int/publi.... Accessed March 25, 2015.
 
6.
Burton S, Hoek J, Nesbit P, Khan A. “Smoking is bad, it's not cool… yet I'm still doing it”: Cues for tobacco consumption in a ‘dark’ market. J Bus Res. 2015;68(10):2067-2074. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.004
 
7.
Bondy S, Bercovitz K. Non-smoking worksites in the residential construction sector: using an online forum to study perspectives and practices. Tob Control. 2011;20(3):189-195. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.038398
 
8.
Sherriff NS, Coleman L. Understanding the needs of smokers who work as routine and manual workers on building sites: results from a qualitative study on workplace smoking cessation. Public Health. 2013;127(2):125-133. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2012.10.002
 
9.
Wang MP, Suen YN, Li WHC, Lau OS, Lam TH, Chan SSC. Proactive outreach smoking cessation program for Chinese employees in China. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2018;73(2):67-78. doi:19338244.2017.1308309
 
10.
Bold KW, Kimmel L, Hanrahan TH. A Pilot Clinical Trial of Smoking Cessation Services Implemented in the Workplace for Service Industry Employees. Am J Health Promot. 2019;33(4):516-524. doi:10.1177/0890117118795987
 
11.
Van den Brand FA, Dohmen LME,Van Schayck OCP, Nagelhout GE. ‘Secretly, it’s a competition’: A qualitative study investigating what helped employees quit smoking during a workplace smoking cessation group training programme with incentives. BMJ Open. 2018;8(11):e023917. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023917
 
12.
Kava CM, Parker EA, Baquero B, Curry S, Gilbert PA, Sauder M, Sewell DK. A qualitative assessment of the smoking policies and cessation activities at smaller workplaces. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1094. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-6001-9
 
13.
Graff SK. There is No Constitutional Right to Smoke. 2nd ed. In: A Law Synopsis by the Tobacco Control Legal Consortium. Saint Paul, MN: Tobacco Control Legal Consortium; 2008. https://www.publichealthlawcen.... Accessed March 25, 2019.
 
14.
United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.un.org/en/universa.... Accessed March 25, 2019.
 
15.
World Health Organization. The Right to Health: Fact Sheet No 31. Geneva, Switzerland: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, World Health Organization; 2008. https://www.ohchr.org/Document.... Accessed March 26, 2019.
 
16.
Office of the Surgeon General, Office on Smoking and Health. The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2004. PMID:20669512.
 
17.
Republic of Mauritius. The Constitution. http://www.govmu.org/English/L.... Accessed March 29, 2019.
 
18.
World Health Organization. The Public Health Act: Government Notice No. 263. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008. https://www.who.int/fctc/repor.... Accessed March 29, 2019.
 
19.
ITC Project. ITC Mauritius National Report - Results of the Wave 3 Survey. Ontario, Canada and Pamplemousses, Mauritius: University of Waterloo and Mauritius Institute of Health (MIH); 2012. https://itcproject.org/files/I.... Accessed March 29, 2019.
 
20.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 2006;3(2):77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
 
21.
Katz JE. Individual rights advocacy in tobacco control policies: an assessment and recommendation. Tob Control. 2005;14(suppl 2):pp.ii31-ii37. doi:10.1136/tc.2004.008060
 
22.
World Health Organization. Advancing the right to health: the vital role of law. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016. https://www.who.int/gender-equ.... Accessed March 28, 2019.
 
23.
Quote Investigator. https://quoteinvestigator.com/. Accessed Jan 19, 2019.
 
24.
Radwan GN, Loffredo CA, Aziz R, Abdel-Aziz N, Labib N. Implementation, barriers and challenges of smoke-free policies in hospitals in Egypt. BMC Research Notes. 2012;5(1). doi:10.1186/1756-0500-5-568
 
25.
Honeycutt A, Bradley C, Khavjou O, Yarnoff B, Soler R, Orenstein D. Simulated impacts and potential cost-effectiveness of Communities Putting Prevention to Work: Tobacco control interventions in 21 US communities, 2010-2020. Prev Med. 2019;120:100-106. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.01.005
 
26.
Warner KE, Smith RJ, Smith DG, Fries BE. Health and economic implications of a work-site smoking-cessation program: a simulation analysis. J Occup Environ Med. 1996;38(10):981-992. doi:10.1097/00043764-199610000-00008
 
27.
Mache S, Vitzthum K, Groneberg DA, Harth V. Effects of a multi-behavioral health promotion program at worksite on smoking patterns and quit behavior. Work. 2019;62(4):543-551. doi:10.3233/WOR-192889
 
28.
Halpern MT, Shikiar R, Rentz AM, Khan ZM. Impact of smoking status on workplace absenteeism and productivity. Tob Control. 2001;10(3):233-238. doi:10.1136/tc.10.3.233
 
eISSN:2459-3087