SHORT REPORT
Cigarette smoking, ENDS use and dual use among a national sample of lesbians, gays and bisexuals
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of South Alabama, Mobile, United States
2
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
3
American Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center (A-TRAC), Dallas, United States
4
University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
5
Northwestern University, Evanston, United States
6
University of Mississippi, Jackson, United States
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Stanley L. Ridner   

University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, United States
Publication date: 2019-12-23
Submission date: 2019-07-26
Final revision date: 2019-10-28
Acceptance date: 2019-11-14
 
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2019;5(December):51
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Historically, lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) individuals have higher rates of cigarette smoking, often attributed to targeted tobacco advertising, exposure to stressors, and psychological distress. Elevated use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) among LGB individuals has been documented recently. However, the LGB groups are not homogeneous and differences may exist between the use of tobacco by men and women within the LGB groups. The purpose of this research was to examine cigarette smoking, ENDS use and dual use (cigarettes plus ENDS) among LGB subgroups.

Methods:
We classified 2087 participants completing a national online survey based on tobacco-use status (i.e. cigarette only, ENDS only, dual use) and sexual orientation. Multinomial logistic regression was employed to assess group differences.

Results:
After adjusting for demographics and socioeconomic status, bisexual women were 1.85 times (95% CI: 1.19–2.87) more likely to report current dual use, in contrast to cigarette only use, compared to heterosexual women. No significant differences were found between lesbian and heterosexual women, or between gay or bisexual men and their heterosexual counterparts.

Conclusions:
This study describes significantly greater dual use by bisexual women and is one of the first reports of elevated dual use in this group compared to heterosexual women. These findings suggest that targeted health messages may be needed to raise awareness of risk in specific LGB groups and that future research with these populations is necessary to better understand differences in tobacco perceptions and use.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors have each completed and submitted an ICMJE form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. KLW reports grants from National Institutes of Health, outside the submitted work. AG, RLL and AK report grants from National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products, during the conduct of the study. JZM reports grants from National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products under Award Number P50HL120163, during the conduct of the study. RMR reports grants from National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products, and that she served as Deputy Chief Science and Medical Officer in American Heart Association, during the conduct of the study. ALG and JLH report grants from National Institutes of Health, during the conduct of the study. The rest of the authors have nothing to disclose.
FUNDING
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Food & Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) under Award Numbers P50HL120163 and U54HL120163. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH, the FDA, or the American Heart Association. The funding sponsors had no role in study design; data collection, analyses, or interpretation; manuscript preparation; or the decision to publish the results.
PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW
Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
 
REFERENCES (23)
1.
Drope J, Liber AC, Cahn Z, et al. Who’s still smoking? Disparities in adult cigarette smoking prevalence in the United States. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(2):106-115. doi:10.3322/caac.21444
 
2.
Centers for Disease Conrol and Prevention. BRFSS Prevalences & Trends Data. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/brfs.... Published 2017. Accessed September 27, 2019.
 
3.
Piper ME, Baker TB, Benowitz NL, Jorenby DE. Changes in use patterns over 1 year among smokers and dual users of combustible and electronic cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019;ntz065. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntz065
 
4.
Lee JGL, Griffin GK, Melvin CL. Tobacco use among sexual minorities in the USA, 1987 to May 2007: A systematic review. Tob Control. 2009;18(4):275-282. doi:10.1136/tc.2008.028241
 
5.
Smith EA, Offen N, Malone RE. Pictures worth a thousand words: Noncommercial tobacco content in the lesbian, gay, and bisexual press. J Health Commun. 2006;11(7):635-649. doi:10.1080/10810730600934492
 
6.
Fallin A, Davis B. LGBT organisation successfully advocated for ban on tobacco promotions in San Jose, California. Tob Control. 2016;25(5):504-505. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052660
 
7.
Remafedi G. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youths: Who smokes, and why? Nicotine Tob Res. 2007;9(1):65-71. doi:10.1080/14622200601083491
 
8.
Gruskin EP, Byrne KM, Altschuler A, Dibble SL. Smoking it all away: Influences of stress, negative emotions, and stigma on lesbian tobacco use. J. LGBT Health Res. 2008;4(4):167-179. doi:10.1080/15574090903141104
 
9.
Bränström R, Pachankis JE. Sexual orientation disparities in the co-occurrence of substance use and psychological distress: a national population-based study (2008-2015). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018;53(4):403-412. doi:10.1007/s00127-018-1491-4
 
10.
Huang J, Kim Y, Vera L, Emery SL. Electronic cigarettes among priority populations: Role of smoking cessation and tobacco control policies. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(2):199-209. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2015.06.032
 
11.
Emory K, Kim Y, Buchting F, Vera L, Huang J, Emery SL. Intragroup variance in lesbian, gay, and bisexual tobacco use behaviors: Evidence that subgroups matter, notably bisexual women. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(6):1494-1501. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv208
 
12.
Johnson SE, Holder-Hayes E, Tessman GK, King BA, Alexander T, Zhao X. Tobacco Product Use Among Sexual Minority Adults: Findings From the 2012−2013 National Adult Tobacco Survey. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50:e91-e100. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.07.021
 
13.
Gruskin EP, Greenwood GL, Matevia M, Pollack LM, Bye LL. Disparities in smoking between the lesbian, gay, and bisexual population and the general population in California. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(8):1496-1502. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2006.090258
 
14.
Schuler MS, Rice CE, Evans-Polce RJ, Collins RL. Disparities in substance use behaviors and disorders among adult sexual minorities by age, gender, and sexual identity. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;189:139-146. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.05.008
 
15.
Li J, Haardörfer R, Vu M, Windle M, Berg CJ. Sex and sexual orientation in relation to tobacco use among young adult college students in the US: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1). doi:10.1186/s12889-018-6150-x
 
16.
Hoffman L, Delahanty J, Johnson SE, Zhao X. Sexual and gender minority cigarette smoking disparities: An analysis of 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. Prev Med. 2018;113:109-115. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.05.014
 
17.
Nayak P, Salazar LF, Kota KK, Pechacek TF. Prevalence of use and perceptions of risk of novel and other alternative tobacco products among sexual minority adults: Results from an online national survey, 2014-2015. Prev Med. 2017;104:71-78. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.024
 
18.
Hyland A, Ambrose BK, Conway KP, et al. Design and methods of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. Tob Control. 2017;26(4):371-378. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-052934
 
19.
Ma JZ, Hart JL, Walker KL, et al. Perceived health risks of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) users: The role of cigarette smoking status. Addict Behav. 2019;91:156-163. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.10.044
 
20.
Vu THT, Hart JL, Groom A, et al. Age differences in electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) usage motivations and behaviors, perceived health benefit, and intention to quit. Addict Behav. 2019;98:106054. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106054
 
21.
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2000. doi:10.1002/0471722146
 
22.
Wheldon CW, Kaufman AR, Kasza KA, Moser RP. Tobacco Use Among Adults by Sexual Orientation: Findings from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. LGBT Health. 2018;5(1):33-44. doi:10.1089/lgbt.2017.0175
 
23.
Delahanty J, Ganz O, Hoffman L, Guillory J, Crankshaw E, Farrelly M. Tobacco use among lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender young adults varies by sexual and gender identity. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;201:161-170. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.04.013
 
eISSN:2459-3087