RESEARCH PAPER
Does adding a psychosocial cessation intervention to an existing life-skills and tobacco-prevention program influence the use of tobacco and supari among secondary school students?: Findings from a quasi-experimental trial in Mumbai, India
 
More details
Hide details
1
Salaam Bombay Foundation, Mumbai, India
2
Narotam Sekhsaria Foundation, Mumbai, India
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Nilesh Chatterjee   

Salaam Bombay Foundation, Mumbai 400021, India
Publish date: 2019-11-26
Submission date: 2019-06-19
Final revision date: 2019-10-18
Acceptance date: 2019-10-24
 
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2019;5(November):45
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
This study aimed to test whether school-going adolescents who self-report tobacco and/or supari use are more likely to quit if a school-based psychosocial cessation intervention is added to an existing life-skills and tobaccoprevention program.

Methods:
A quasi-experimental trial with pre-test and post-test 20 weeks after the intervention was conducted with students from low-income families in 12 schools in Mumbai; six schools were randomly assigned to the intervention and the remaining to the comparison condition. Participants were students from grades 7, 8 and 9 who self-reported tobacco and/or supari use. Intervention schools received six sessions of LifeFirst, a psychosocial group-based tobacco cessation intervention program, in addition to SuperArmy, a school-wide lifeskills and tobacco-prevention program. Trained counselors facilitated the cessation intervention, which spanned five months. All students in comparison schools received only SuperArmy. The outcome measures were self-reported use of tobacco-only, supari-only, and tobacco plus supari in the past 30 days.

Results:
The number of all users decreased by 19.1% in the intervention and 18.7% in the comparison schools at post-test. Although this reduction was significant (p<0.001) within each group, the difference between intervention and comparison schools was not significant. Further segregation by type of product used showed that for tobacco-only users there was a non-significant increase of 1.7% in intervention schools, and a significant 26.2% increase (p<0.001) in the comparison group. Tobacco plus supari use declined in both groups; however, supari-only use fell by 14.8% in the intervention and 32.7% in the comparison schools (p<0.01).

Conclusions:
The combination of a cessation intervention along with the life-skills and tobacco-prevention program appear to have halted tobacco-only use in the intervention group. Future research needs to determine whether students are substituting supari for tobacco and to understand the psychological mechanisms underlying the cessation intervention and the interaction between cessation and prevention-only interventions.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors acknowledge the help of Priyamvada Todankar, Holly Tibble, Genevie Fernandes and the teams that helped in the implementation of LifeFirst and SuperArmy and provided support for data collection and data entry.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none was reported.
FUNDING
This study was funded by Narotam Sekhsaria Foundation.
AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS
NC, HG and GM conceptualized and designed the study. NC and HG conducted the analysis and interpretations of the findings, drafted and revised the final version of the manuscript. TB and GM collected the data and contributed to the analysis and provided feedback on the final version of the manuscript.
PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW
Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
 
REFERENCES (33)
1.
World Health Organization. Factsheet 2018: India. New Delhi: World Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia. https://apps.who.int/iris/bits.... Accessed June 11, 2019.
 
2.
World Health Organization, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Tata Institute of Social Sciences. Global adult tobacco survey: Gats-2 India 2016-2017. http://www.searo.who.int/india.... Published March 2017. Accessed June 11, 2019.
 
3.
Jha P, Jacob B, Gajalakshmi V, et al. A nationally representative case–control study of smoking and death in India. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(11):1137-1147. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa0707719
 
4.
Sullivan R, Badwe R, Rath G, et al. Cancer research in India: national priorities, global results. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(6):e213-e222. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70109-3
 
5.
Shimkhada R, Peabody JW. Tobacco control in India. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(1):48-52. PMID:12640476.
 
6.
John R, Rout S, Kumar B, Arora M. Economic burden of tobacco-related diseases in India. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2014. https://mohfw.gov.in/sites/def.... Accessed June 11, 2019.
 
7.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. India (Ages 13-15) Global youth tobacco survey (GYTS): Fact sheet . New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2009. https://www.who.int/fctc/repor.... Accessed June 19, 2019.
 
8.
World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, International Institute for Population Sciences, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Global adult tobacco survey: India 2009-2010. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2010. http://www.searo.who.int/tobac.... Accessed June 19, 2019.
 
9.
Gajalakshmi V, Kanimozhi C. A Survey of 24,000 Students Aged 13–15 Years in India: Global Youth Tobacco Survey 2006 and 2009. Tob Use Insights. 2010;3. doi:10.1177/1179173X1000300001
 
10.
Khandelwal V, Saha M, Khandelwal S, Prasad S, Saha S, Khandelwal A. Prevalence of areca nut chewing in the middle school-going children of Indore, India. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012;3(2):155. doi:10.4103/0976-237x.96817
 
11.
Chatterjee N, Patil D, Kadam R, Fernandes G. The Tobacco-Free Village Program: Helping Rural Areas Implement and Achieve Goals of Tobacco Control Policies in India. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017;5(3):476-485. doi:10.9745/ghsp-d-17-00064
 
12.
Garg A, Chaturvedi P, Gupta PC. A review of the systemic adverse effects of areca nut or betel nut. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2014;35(1):3-9. doi:10.4103/0971-5851.133702
 
13.
Oakley E, Demaine L, Warnakulasuriya S. Areca (betel) nut chewing habit among high-school children in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (Micronesia). Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83(9):656-660. PMID:16211156.
 
14.
Boucher B, Mannan N. Metabolic effects of the consumption of Areca catechu. Addict Biol. 2002;7(1):103-110. doi:10.1080/13556210120091464
 
15.
he International Agency for Research on Cancer. Tobacco: A Major International Health Hazard. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1986.
 
16.
Pentz, M. Effective prevention programs for tobacco use. Nicotine Tob Res. 1999;1(Suppl 2):99-107. doi:10.1080/14622299050011891
 
17.
Farrelly M, Loomis B, Kuiper N, et al. Are Tobacco Control Policies Effective in Reducing Young Adult Smoking? J Adolesc Health. 2014;54(4):481-486. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.09.015
 
18.
Ministry of Home Affairs. Population Enumeration Data (Final Population). New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, Ministry of Home Affairs; 2012. http://www.censusindia.gov.in/.... Accessed April 8, 2019.
 
19.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Acts Rules Regulations: Tobacco Control and Related Laws in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2019. Accessed June 1, 2019.
 
20.
Chatterjee N, Kadam R, Patil D, Todankar P. Adherence to the Tobacco-Free School Policy in Rural India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18(9):2367-2373. PMID:28950680.
 
21.
Murthy P, Saddichha S. Tobacco cessation services in India: Recent developments and the need for expansion. Indian J Cancer. 2010;47(5):69-74. doi:10.4103/0019-509x.63873
 
22.
Thankappan K. Tobacco cessation in India: A priority health intervention. Indian J Med Res. 2014;139(4):484-486. PMID:25055394.
 
23.
Press Trust of India. Over 2 million enrolled in India's quit tobacco programme in a year: WHO. The Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatim.... Published July 23, 2017. Accessed April 8, 2019.
 
24.
World Health Organization. Scaling up tobacco cessation in India using mobile technology. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. http://www.who.int/tobacco/qui.... Accessed June 8, 2019.
 
25.
Bach L. How Schools Can Help Students Stay Tobacco-Free: Fact sheets. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. https://www.tobaccofreekids.or.... Published January 12, 2017. Accessed June 18, 2019.
 
26.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, 2017. TX: StataCorp LLC. https://www.stata.com/. Accessed November 21, 2019.
 
27.
Fanshawe TR, Halliwell W, Lindson N, Aveyard P, Livingstone-Banks J, Hartmann-Boyce J. Tobacco cessation interventions for young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11:CD003289. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003289.pub6
 
28.
Perry C, Stigler M, Arora M, Reddy K. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Young People in India: Project MYTRI. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(5):899-906. doi:10.2105/ajph.2008.145433
 
29.
Sorensen G, Gupta P, Nagler E, Viswanath K. Promoting Life Skills and Preventing Tobacco Use among Low-Income Mumbai Youth: Effects of Salaam Bombay Foundation Intervention. Plos ONE. 2012;7(4):e34982. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034982
 
30.
European Network for Smoking and Tobacco. Guidelines for treating tobacco dependence. Brussels, Belgium: European Network for Smoking and Tobacco; 2018. http://elearning-ensp.eu/. Accessed September 29, 2019.
 
31.
Adelman WP, Duggan AK, Hauptman P, Joffe A. Effectiveness of a High School Smoking Cessation Program. Pediatrics. 2001;107(4):e50-e50. doi:10.1542/peds.107.4.e50
 
32.
Kim S, Nam K, Seo M, Lee H. Effectiveness of a Smoking Cessation Program for Adolescents. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2004;34(4):646. doi:10.4040/jkan.2004.34.4.646
 
33.
Sussman S. Effects of sixty six adolescent tobacco use cessation trials and seventeen prospective studies of self-initiated quitting. Tob Induc Dis. 2006;1(1):5. doi:10.1186/1617-9625-1-5
 
eISSN:2459-3087