POLICY CASE STUDIES
Key factors in achieving increased tobacco taxation: Experience from the island of Saint Helena
 
More details
Hide details
1
Health Directorate, Saint Helena Government, Jamestown, Saint Helena
2
WHO FCTC Secretariat Knowledge Hub on Taxation, South Africa National Department of Health, Cape Town, South Africa
3
School of Economics and Finance, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Angela Jackson-Morris   

Health Directorate, Saint Helena Government, Jamestown, Saint Helena
Publication date: 2020-06-16
Submission date: 2020-02-26
Final revision date: 2020-04-17
Acceptance date: 2020-05-14
 
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2020;6(June):38
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Concerted efforts by government officials and technical assistance from the World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) Secretariat Knowledge Hub on Tobacco Taxation and Illicit Trade, resulted in an increase in tobacco taxation in Saint Helena during 2019. This formed part of a broader package of Tobacco Control measures to reduce the burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCD) on the island. We elaborate on key contextual and contributing factors that resulted in positive policy change in a relatively short period of time. These included political support for a strategic approach to address prevalent NCD in the context of an ageing population, high overseas health care costs and Overseas Development Aid dependency. Previous experience of impact from sugar-sweetened beverage taxation when combined with wider system measures, and the similar accompaniment of the tobacco taxation proposals with wider measures, encouraged policymakers to use tobacco taxation to curb cigarette consumption. These factors created readiness, and tailored technical assistance from an international, donor-funded partner and specifically modelling to provide evidence-based predictions of impact augmented confidence of policy benefit and enabled passage. This experience may serve as a point of reference for other countries that wish to implement similar policy changes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Our thanks to Members of the Public Health Committee of the Saint Helena Government (SHG), who championed the tobacco taxation proposals, and to the SHG Finance and Statistics teams who provided data and support to the proposals.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none was reported.
FUNDING
The WHO FCTC Knowledge Hub on Tobacco Taxation and Illicit Trade receives funding from Cancer Research UK (Grant number: C62640/ A24723).
PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW
Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
 
REFERENCES (15)
1.
World Health Organization. The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: an overview. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003. https://www.who.int/fctc/about.... Accessed April 17, 2020.
 
2.
U.S. National Cancer Institute, World Health Organization. Monograph 21: The Economics of Tobacco and Tobacco Control. National Cancer Institute Tobacco Control. In: NIH Publication No 16-CA-8029A. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, National Cancer Institute; 2016. https://cancercontrol.cancer.g.... Accessed April 17, 2020.
 
3.
Health and Healthcare in the British Overseas Territories: Regional and UK Government Support. https://assets.publishing.serv.... Published 2010. Accessed April 17, 2020.
 
4.
Government of Saint Helena. Estimates of Revenue, Expenditure and Capital Expenditure 2019/20 – 2020-21. https://www.sainthelena.gov.sh.... Accessed April 17, 2020.
 
5.
Government of Saint Helena. Strategic Framework for Health Promotion on St Helena (2018-2019) 238. http://www.sainthelena.gov.sh/.... Accessed April 17, 2020.
 
6.
Government of Saint Helena, Statistics Office. St Helena 2016 Population & Housing Census: Summary report. http://www.sainthelena.gov.sh/.... Published 2016. Accessed April 17, 2020.
 
7.
Bloom DE, Chatterji S, Kowal P, Lloyd-Sherlock P, McKee M, Rechel B, Rosenberg L, Smith JP. Macroeconomic implications of population ageing and selected policy responses. Lancet. 2015;385(9968):649-657. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61464-1
 
8.
Divo MJ, Martinez CH, Mannino DM. Ageing and the epidemiology of multimorbidity. Eur Respiratory Soc. 2014;44(4):1055-1068. doi:10.1183/09031936.00059814
 
9.
Jackson-Morris A. The contribution of a ‘whole of government’ smoke-free policy on the island of St Helena. Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1681756. doi:10.1080/16549716.2019.1681756
 
10.
Warner KE. The economics of tobacco: myths and realities. Tob Control. 2000;9(1):78-89. doi:10.1136/tc.9.1.78
 
11.
Government of Saint Helena. Economic Development Committee Meeting – Thursday 25 April, 2019. http://www.sainthelena.gov.sh/.... Published May 3, 2019. Accessed May 14, 2020.
 
12.
Mehrotra R, Grover S, Chandra A. Role of world health organization framework convention on tobacco control global knowledge hub on smokeless tobacco. Indian J Med Res. 2018;148(1):7-13. doi:10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_2036_17
 
13.
Drope JM. The politics of smoke-free policies in developing countries: Lessons from Africa. CVD Prevention and Control. 2010;5(3):65-73. doi:10.1016/j.cvdpc.2010.07.001
 
14.
Van Walbeek C. Tobacco control in South Africa in the 1990s: a mix of advocacy, academic research and policy. South African Journal of Economic History. 2004;19(1-2):100-131. doi:10.1080/10113430409511172
 
15.
Van Walbeek C. A simulation model to predict the fiscal and public health impact of a change in cigarette excise taxes. Tob Control. 2010;19(1):31-36. doi:10.1136/tc.2008.028779
 
eISSN:2459-3087