Research paper
 
CC-BY-NC 4.0
 
 

Price promotions and marketing within points of sale around high schools in Greece during the 2012 economic crisis

Charis Girvalaki 1, 2,  
Lambros Lazuras 3  ,  
Anna Tzortzi 2,  
 
1
Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
2
George D. Behrakis Research Center, Hellenic Cancer Society, Athens, Greece
3
Sheffield Hallam University, Department of Psychology, Sociology & Politics, UK
4
South-East European Research Centre (SEERC), Thessaloniki, Greece
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2015;1(December):9
Publish date: 2015-12-29
KEYWORDS:
TOPICS:
 
ABSTRACT:
Introduction:
Price promotions within points of sale (POS) are a significant risk factor for smoking initiation and pro-smoking beliefs among adolescents. The aim of the present study was to assess the quantity and types of tobacco advertisements and price promotions within POS located around schools (<300 m) in two major cities in Greece during the period of economic crisis (2011-2012).

Methods:
POS that were within close proximity (<300m) to high schools in the cities of Heraklion and Thessaloniki, Greece was assessed with the use of Google Maps and on foot surveillance, while indoor and outdoor advertising characteristics were assessed within each POS. A total of 226 POS were identified around the 23 schools assessed in the two cities (n=13 in Heraklion and n=10 in Thessaloniki).

Results:
On average there were 10 POS around each school, with one in eight POS directly visible from school gates. Advertising was more common inside than outside and price promotions were also more frequent indoors. British American Tobacco and Philip Morris International were responsible for >60% of outdoor price promotions.

Conclusions:
Price promotions were noted within the majority of POS close to schools. Aggressive promotional activities may hinder efforts to de-normalize tobacco use, especially during financial crisis when price promotions may pose as more attractive to potential consumers.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Lambros Lazuras   
Department of Psychology, Sociology & Politics Sheffield Hallam University, 42 Collegiate Crescent, S10 2BQ Sheffield, UK
 
REFERENCES:
1. Alleyne G, Binagwaho A, Haines A, Jahan S, Nugent R, Rojhani A, Stuckler D. Embedding non-communicable diseases in the post-2015 development agenda. Lancet 2013; 381: 566-74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61806-6.
2. Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Horton R et al. Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis. Lancet 2011; 377: 1438-47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60393-0.
3. Glantz S, Gonzalez M. Effective tobacco control is key to rapid progress in reduction of non-communicable diseases. Lancet 2012; 379: 1269-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60615-6.
4. Vardavas CI, Connolly GN, Kafatos AG. Geographical information systems as a tool for monitoring tobacco industry advertising. Tob Control 2009; 18(3): 190-196. doi:10.1136/tc.2008.026856.
5. Vardavas CI, Girvalaki C, Lazuras L, Triantafylli D, Lionis C, Connolly GN, Behrakis P. Changes in tobacco industry advertising around high schools in Greece following an outdoor advertising ban: a follow-up study. Tob Control. 2013 Sep;22(5):299-301. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050518.
6. Slater SJ, Chaloupka FJ, Wakefield M, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM. The impact of retail cigarette marketing practices on youth smoking uptake. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007; 161 (5): 440 – 445. doi:10.1001/archpedi.161.5.440.
7. Henriksen L, Feighery EC, Schleicher NC, Cowling DW, Kline RS, Fortmann, SP (2008) Is adolescent smoking related to the density and proximity of tobacco outlets and retail cigarette advertising near schools? Prev Med 47: 210 – 214. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.04.008.
8. Lovato C, Watts A, Stead LF (2011) Impact of tobacco advertising and promotion on increasing adolescent smoking behaviours. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10: CD003439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003439.pub2.
9. Alpert HR, Vardavas CI, Chaloupka FJ, Vozikis A, Athanasakis K, Kyriopoulos I, Bertic M, Behrakis PK, Connolly GN. The recent and projected public health and economic benefits of cigarette taxation in Greece. Tob Control. 2014 Sep;23(5):452-4. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050857.
10. Filippidis FT, Vardavas CI, Loukopoulou A, Behrakis P, Connolly GN, Tountas Y. Prevalence and determinants of tobacco use among adults in Greece: 4 year trends. Eur J Public Health. 2013 Oct;23(5):772-6. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks148.
11. Liozidou A, Dimou N, Lioupa A, Behrakis P. Prevalence and predictors of cigarette smoking among Greek urban adolescents: A cross-sectional study. Tob. Prev. Cessation 2015;1(October):4. doi: 10.18332/tpc/59483.
12. Ross H, Chaloupka FJ, Wakefield M. Youth smoking uptake progress: price and public policy effects. Eastern Econ J 2006; 32(2): 355-67. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40326276.
13. Henriksen L, Feighery EC, Wang Y, Fortmann SP. Association of retail tobacco marketing with adolescent smoking. Am J Public Health 2004; 94(12): 2081-2083. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.12.2081.
14. Henriksen L, Feighery E, Schleicher N, Halajian H, Fortmann, S. Reaching youth at the point of sale: cigarette marketing is more prevalent in stores where adolescents shop frequently. Tob Control 2004; 13: 315 – 318. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.006577.
15. Paynter J, Edwards R. The impact of tobacco promotion at the point of sale: A systematic review. Nicotine Tob Res 2009; 11(1): 25-35. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntn002.
16. Karanikolos M, Mladovsky P, Cylus J, Thomson S, Basu S, Stuckler D, Mackenbach JP, McKee M. Financial crisis, austerity, and health in Europe. Lancet 2013; 381(9874): 1323-1331. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60102-6.
eISSN:2459-3087