RESEARCH PAPER
Provision of free nicotine replacement therapy to parental smokers in the pediatric emergency setting
 
More details
Hide details
1
Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, United States
2
School of Human Services, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States
3
Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, United States
4
College of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
E. Melinda Mahabee-Gittens   

Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 2008, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, United States
Publication date: 2020-05-18
Submission date: 2020-02-03
Final revision date: 2020-03-06
Acceptance date: 2020-03-17
 
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2020;6(May):30
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Although the administration of free Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) is effective in helping smokers quit, the feasibility, acceptability and safety of this practice have not been examined in the emergency setting of the pediatric emergency department (PED) or urgent care (UC). We examined the characteristics of parental smokers who were interested and eligible for free NRT during their child’s emergency visit and the uptake, usage, and associated side effects of NRT use.

Methods:
We analyzed data from 377 parental smokers who were randomized to receive cessation counseling and free NRT as part of an emergency visit-based randomized controlled trial. Parents interested in NRT were screened for medical contraindications; eligible parents were given a 6-week supply of NRT patches or lozenges during their child’s emergency visit and offered another supply 6 weeks later. We conducted Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and chi-squared tests to address our main study objective.

Results:
The majority of parents were female (87.5%), non-Hispanic Black (52.5%), and mean (SD) age was 33.1 (8.2) years. A total of 252 (66.8%) parents were interested in receiving NRT. Compared to uninterested parents, interested parents were more likely to: be older [33.6 (8.2) vs 31.9 (8.2), years]; be non-Hispanic Black (54.0% vs 49.6%); have older children [5.5 (5.0) vs 4.2 (4.6)]; have a higher readiness to quit [7.0 (2.4) vs 5.2 (2.6)]; and have a child being evaluated in UC compared to the PED (72.4% vs 56.5%). A total of 53 (21%) interested parents had >1 NRT contraindications. At 6 weeks, 94 (79.0%) parents reported some ≥NRT usage and 50 (53.2%) requested an additional 6-week supply. There were no serious adverse events and 5 (5.3%) reported minor side effects.

Conclusions:
Parental smokers in the emergency setting are interested in receiving free NRT, the majority use it, and use is not associated with adverse side effects. The emergency visit may be an optimal time to offer NRT to parental smokers.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none was reported.
FUNDING
This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health R01HD083354 (EMMG) and K01DA044313 (ALM).
AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS
EMMG conceived the study, overall study aims, study design, and wrote the first draft of the paper. MET and JCK conducted the statistical analyses and interpreted the data. LS supervised participant recruitment and data collection and created databases for analyses. ALM and JSG provided input on the overall study aims, analyses and interpretation of data. All authors made critical comments and revised drafts of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW
Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
 
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Jenssen BP, Wilson KM. Tobacco Control and Treatment for the Pediatric Clinician: Practice, Policy, and Research Updates. Acad Pediatr. 2017;17(3):233-242. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2016.12.010
 
2.
Farber HJ, Walley SC, Groner JA, Nelson KE, Section on Tobacco C. Clinical Practice Policy to Protect Children From Tobacco, Nicotine, and Tobacco Smoke. Pediatrics. 2015;136(5):1008-1017. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-3108
 
3.
Farber HJ, Groner J, Walley S, Nelson K, Section On Tobacco C. Protecting Children From Tobacco, Nicotine, and Tobacco Smoke. Pediatrics. 2015;136(5):e1439-1467. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-3110
 
4.
Marbin JN, Gribben V. Tobacco Use as a Health Disparity: What Can Pediatric Clinicians Do? Children. 2019;6(2):31. doi:10.3390/children6020031
 
5.
McMillen R, O'Connor KG, Groner J, Tanski S, Park ER, Klein JD. Changes and Factors Associated With Tobacco Counseling: Results From the AAP Periodic Survey. Acad Pediatr. 2017;17(5):504-514. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2017.01.002
 
6.
Committee on Environmental Health, Committee on Substance Abuse, Committee on Adolescence, Committee on Native American Child. Tobacco use: a pediatric disease. Pediatrics. 2009;124(5):1474-1487. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-2114
 
7.
Torok MR, Lowary M, Ziniel SI, et al. Perceptions of Parental Tobacco Dependence Treatment Among a Children's Hospital Staff. Hosp Pediatr. 2018;8(11):724-728. doi:10.1542/hpeds.2018-0009
 
8.
Hartmann-Boyce J, Chepkin SC, Ye W, Bullen C, Lancaster T. Nicotine replacement therapy versus control for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5:CD000146. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000146.pub5
 
9.
Pelletier JH, Strout TD, Baumann MR. A systematic review of smoking cessation interventions in the emergency setting. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32(7):713-724. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2014.03.042
 
10.
Lindson N, Chepkin SC, Ye W, Fanshawe TR, Bullen C, Hartmann-Boyce J. Different doses, durations and modes of delivery of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4:CD013308. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013308
 
11.
Stead LF, Perera R, Bullen C, et al. Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD000146. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000146.pub3
 
12.
Adams AJ, Hudmon KS. Pharmacist prescriptive authority for smoking cessation medications in the United States. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2018;58(3):253-257. doi:10.1016/j.japh.2017.12.015
 
13.
Bernstein SL, D'Onofrio G, Rosner J, et al. Successful Tobacco Dependence Treatment in Low-Income Emergency Department Patients: A Randomized Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;66(2):140-147. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.03.030
 
14.
Lemhoefer C, Rabe GL, Wellmann J, et al. Emergency Department-Initiated Tobacco Control: Update of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Prev Chronic Dis. 2017;14:E89. doi:10.5888/pcd14.160434
 
15.
Bernstein SL, Bijur P, Cooperman N, et al. A randomized trial of a multicomponent cessation strategy for emergency department smokers. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(6):575-583. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01097.x
 
16.
Anders ME, Sheffer CE, Barone CP, Holmes TM, Simpson DD, Duncan AM. Emergency department-initiated tobacco dependence treatment. Am J Health Behav. 2011;35(5):546-556. doi:10.5993/ajhb.35.5.4
 
17.
Mahabee-Gittens EM, Ammerman RT, Khoury JC, et al. Healthy families: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of a screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment intervention for caregivers to reduce secondhand smoke exposure among pediatric emergency patients. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):374. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4278-8
 
18.
Fiore MC, Jaén CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. Clinical practice guideline. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services. doi:10.1037/e481882008-001
 
19.
Rigotti NA. Pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation in adults. https://www.uptodate.com/conte.... Accessed January 15, 2020.
 
20.
Vinokur AD, Price RH, Caplan RD. Hard times and hurtful partners: how financial strain affects depression and relationship satisfaction of unemployed persons and their spouses. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;71(1):166-179. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.166
 
21.
Biener L, Abrams DB. The Contemplation Ladder: validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation. Health Psychol. 1991;10(5):360-365. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.10.5.360
 
22.
Chabrol H, Niezborala M, Chastan E, de Leon J. Comparison of the Heavy Smoking Index and of the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence in a sample of 749 cigarette smokers. Addict Behav. 2005;30(7):1474-1477. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.02.001
 
23.
Mahabee-Gittens EM, Khoury JC, Ho M, Stone L, Gordon JS. A smoking cessation intervention for low-income smokers in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(8):1056-1061. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2015.04.058
 
24.
Enyioha C, Meernik C, Ranney L, Goldstein AO, Sellman K, Kistler CE. Willingness-to-try various tobacco cessation methods among US adult cigarette smokers. Tob Prev Cessat. 2019;5(May). doi:10.18332/tpc/108555
 
25.
Choo EK, Sullivan AF, LoVecchio F, Perret JN, Camargo CA, Boudreaux ED. Patient preferences for emergency department-initiated tobacco interventions: a multicenter cross-sectional study of current smokers. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2012;7:4. doi:10.1186/1940-0640-7-4
 
26.
Liebmann EP, Scheuermann TS, Faseru B, Richter KP. Critical steps in the path to using cessation pharmacotherapy following hospital-initiated tobacco treatment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):246. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4059-4
 
27.
Chui CY, Thomas D, Taylor S, et al. Factors associated with nicotine replacement therapy use among hospitalised smokers. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018;37(4):514-519. doi:10.1111/dar.12661
 
28.
Boudreaux ED, Baumann BM, Friedman K, Ziedonis DM. Smoking stage of change and interest in an emergency department-based intervention. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12(3):211-218. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2005.tb00871.x
 
29.
McCarthy M, Siahpush M, Shaikh RA, Sikora Kessler A, Tibbits M. Social Disparities in Unaided Quit Attempts Among Daily Current and Former Smokers: Results From the 2010-2011 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(8):1705-1710. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntw007
 
30.
Sheffer C, Brackman S, Lercara C, et al. When Free Is Not for Me: Confronting the Barriers to Use of Free Quitline Telephone Counseling for Tobacco Dependence. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;13(1):15. doi:10.3390/ijerph13010015
 
31.
Sheffer CE, Brackman SL, Cottoms N, Olsen M. Understanding the barriers to use of free, proactive telephone counseling for tobacco dependence. Qual Health Res. 2011;21(8):1075-1085. doi:10.1177/1049732311404248
 
32.
Reitzel LR, Langdon KJ, Nguyen NT, Zvolensky MJ. Financial strain and smoking cessation among men and women within a self-guided quit attempt. Addict Behav. 2015;47:66-69. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.03.026
 
33.
Siahpush M, McNeill A, Borland R, Fong GT. Socioeconomic variations in nicotine dependence, selfefficacy, and intention to quit across four countries : findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2006;15(suppl_3):iii71-iii75. doi:10.1136/tc.2004.008763
 
34.
Siu AL, Force USPST. Behavioral and Pharmacotherapy Interventions for Tobacco Smoking Cessation in Adults, Including Pregnant Women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(8):622-634. doi:10.7326/m15-2023
 
35.
Stefan MS, Pack Q, Shieh MS, et al. The Association of Nicotine Replacement Therapy With Outcomes Among Smokers Hospitalized for a Major Surgical Procedure. Chest. 2019:S0012-3692(0019)34368-34365. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2019.10.054
 
eISSN:2459-3087