Research paper
CC-BY-NC 4.0

Refuting tobacco-industry funded research: empirical data shows decline in smoking prevalence following introduction of plain packaging in Australia

Pascal A Diethelm 1  ,  
OxyRomandie, Switzerland
Sigma3 Services Sàrl, Switzerland
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2015;1(November):6
Publish date: 2015-11-27
Country legislation to introduce plain packaging of tobacco products has been vigorously attacked by the tobacco industry claiming that there is no measurable impact on smoking rates on the basis of two industry-funded working papers which examined trends in smoking prevalence in Australia. Objective: To assess the effect of plain packaging on smoking prevalence in Australia, taking into account key tobacco control measures, with the aim of investigating the findings of the industry-funded study.

Monthly smoking prevalence and sample sizes from repeat cross-sectional surveys were reconstructed from the published working paper using an original reverse-engineering technique that achieved nearly 100% accuracy and analysed as a time series using logistic regression. Indicator variables reflecting comprehensive smoke-free policy, graphic health warnings, 25% taxation increase, and introduction of plain packaging were constructed from official information.

Smoking prevalence declined from 25% to 18% over the 13 year period – an overall 28% relative reduction or average 2.8% (95% confidence interval 2.6% - 2.9%) annual reduction. A significantly improved fit was obtained by the full model which included terms for tax increase (4.8%, 2.7% - 6.8% reduction), comprehensive smoke-free policy (4.5%, 1.7% - 7.2% reduction) and plain packaging (3.7%, 1.1% - 6.2% reduction) in addition to an adjusted average annual reduction of 1.7% (1.3% - 2.2%).

A significant decline in smoking prevalence in Australia followed introduction of plain packaging after adjustment for the impact of other tobacco control measures. This conclusion is in marked contrast to that from the industry-funded analysis.

Pascal A Diethelm   
OxyRomandie, 2, rue de la Fontaine, CH-1204 Geneva, Switzerland
1. Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Guidelines forImplementation of Article 11 (Packaging and Labelling of Tobacco Products). 2008. Available from: (accessed 11 Oct 2015).
2. Australian Government. Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011, An Actto discourage the use of tobacco products, and for related purposes, No. 148, 2011. Available from: (accessed 11 Oct 2015).
3. Scollo M, Lindorff K, Coomber K, et al. Standardised packagingand new enlarged graphic health warnings for tobacco products in Australia — legislative requirements and implementation of the Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011 and the Competition and Consumer (Tobacco) Information Standard, 2011. Tob. Control 2015;24:ii9–ii16. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052073.
4. Kennedy MS. Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Act: Convergenceof Public Health and Global Trade. North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation. Volume 39 - Issue 2, Winter 2014, 591-629.
5. See for instance the papers published in Tobacco Control, April2015, Volume 24, Suppl. 2: Implementation and evaluation of the Australian tobacco plain packaging policy. Available from: (accessed 11 Oct 2015).
6. Walton D. Appeal to ignorance, or Argumentum ad Ignorantiam.\ Argumentation. 13:367-377, 1999. Available from: (accessed 11 Oct 2015).
7. British American Tobacco UK Ltd. Consultation on the Introductionof Regulations for the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products; Response of British American Tobacco UK Limited. 7 August 2014. Available from: (accessed 11 Oct 2015).
8. Kaul A and Wolf M. The (Possible) Effect of Plain Packaging onthe Smoking Prevalence of Minors in Australia: A Trend Analysis. University of Zurich Department of Economics Working Paper Series. May 2014; Available from: (accessed 11 Oct 2015).
9. Kaul A and Wolf M. The (Possible) Effect of Plain Packaging on Smoking Prevalence in Australia: A Trend Analysis. University ofZurich Department of Economics Working Paper, June 2014. Series.Available from: (accessed 11 Oct 2015).
10. Japan Tobacco International. JTI’s response to the UK Departmentof Health’s consultation on the introduction of regulations forstandardised packaging of tobacco products. 6 August 2014.Available from (accessed 11 Oct 2015).
11. Philip Morris Limited. Response to the Consultation on “StandardisedPackaging”. 7 August 2014. Available from: (accessed 11 Oct 2015).
12. An interview with Dr Ashok Kaul. 15 April 2014 Available from: (accessed 11 Oct 2015).
13. Cancer Council Victoria M, Australia. Comments on Kaul & Wolf“The (possible) effect of plain packaging on the smoking prevalenceof minors in Australia: a trend analysis”. Available from: (accessed 11 Oct2015).
14. Laverty AA, Watt HC, Arnott D, et al. Standardised packaging andtobacco-industry-funded research. The Lancet 2014; 383(9926): 1384. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60499-2.
15. Diethelm, P and McKee M, Tobacco industry-funded research onstandardised packaging: there are none so blind as those who will not see! Tob Control Published Online First: 7 July 2014. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051734.
16. Laverty AA, Diethelm P, Hopkinson NS, et al. Use and abuse ofstatistics in tobacco industry-funded research on standardised packaging. Tob Control Published Online First: 5 March 2015. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052051.
17. Meeting to discuss “The (Possible) Effect of Plain Packagingon the Smoking Prevalence of Minors in Australia: A Trend Analysis” working paper. Attendees: Prof. Dr. Ashok Kaul, Saarland University; Prof. Michael Wolf, PhD, Zurich University; Christopher Cox, Review Secretariat; James Collis, Review Secretariat; Lucy Edwards (Notetaker). 20 March 2014. Available from: (accessed 11 Oct 2015).
18. Wakefield MA, Durkin S, Spittal MJ, Siahpush M, Scollo M, SimpsonJA, et al. Impact of tobacco control policies and mass media campaigns on monthly adult smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:1443-50. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.128991.
19. Wakefield MA, Coomber K, Durkin SJ, Scollo M, et al. Time seriesanalysis of the impact of tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence among Australian adults, 2001-2011. Bull World Health Organ 2014; 92:413-422. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.118448.
20. Roy Morgan Research. How we collect and process Single Sourcedata in Australia. Melbourne (Australia). Roy Morgan Research. Available from: (accessed 11 Oct 2015).
21. Wikipedia. List of smoking bans in Australia. Wikipedia. Availablefrom: (accessed 11 Oct 2015).
22. Estimated Resident Population, States and Territories. [Catalogueno. 3101.0] Australian Bureau of Statistics, Commonwealth of Australia; 2015.
23. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention, Tobacco Control, Vol. 14:Effectiveness of Tax and Price Policies for Tobacco Control. 2011: Lyon, France.
24. Young JM, Stacey I, Dobbins TA, Dunlop S, et al. Associationbetween tobacco plain packaging and Quitline calls: a population-based, interrupted time-series analysis. MJA 2014; 200: 29–32. doi: 10.5694/mja13.11070.
25. Australian Government, Department of Health. Tobacco key factsand figures. Available from: (accessed 11 Oct 2015).
26. Australian Government, Department of Health. Introduction ofTobacco Plain Packaging in Australia. Available from: (accessed 11 Oct 2015).
27. Pechey R, Spiegelhalter D, Marteau TM. Impact of plain packaging oftobacco products on smoking in adults and children: an elicitation of international experts’ estimates. BMC public health 2013;13:18. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-18.
28. Wong SL, Shields M, Leatherdale S, Malaison E and HammondD. Assessment of validity of self-reported smoking status Statistics Canada, Catalogue no. 82-003-XPE, Health Reports, Vol. 23, no. 1, March 2012. Available from: (accessed 11 Oct 2015).
29. White V, Bariola E, Faulkner A, Coomber K, Wakefield M. Graphichealth warnings on cigarette packs: how long before the effects on adolescents wear out? Nicotine Tob Res first published online September 19, 2014. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu184.