RESEARCH PAPER
Relationship between population characteristics, e-cigarette and tobacco-related perceptions, and likelihood of ever using e-cigarettes
Jack A. Pfeiffer 1, 2
,  
Joy L. Hart 2, 3, 4  
,  
Anshula Kesh 4
,  
Allison Groom 4
,  
Thanh-Huyen T. Vu 4, 5
,  
Jennie Z. Ma 4, 6
,  
Robyn Landry 4
,  
Thomas J. Payne 4, 7
,  
Aida L. Giachello 4, 8
,  
Kandi L. Walker 2, 3, 4
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Epidemiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
2
Christina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
3
Department of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
4
American Heart Association, Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, United States
5
Department of Preventative Medicine (Epidemiology), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, United States
6
Division of Biostatistics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
7
Department of Otolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, United States
8
Department of Preventative Medicine (Public Health Practice), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, United States
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Joy L. Hart   

Christina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
Publication date: 2020-03-18
Submission date: 2019-11-10
Final revision date: 2020-01-25
Acceptance date: 2020-01-26
 
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2020;6(March):20
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are a relatively new type of nicotine-containing product that has risen greatly in use within the past decade, displacing conventional tobacco products as the dominant source of nicotine exposure by many groups. Among those impacted are large sections of US youth. Though health outcomes associated with ENDS use are still being assessed, several potential harms have been noted in the extant literature. The purpose of this study is to examine which US youth subpopulations are at greatest risk for ENDS ever use and how perceptions pertaining to nicotine-containing products relate to this risk.

Methods:
A nationwide online survey was administered to US youth ENDS users and non-users aged 13–18 years. A total weighted sample of 2501 participants was obtained. Statistical analyses included binomial logistic regression and a likelihood ratio test.

Results:
Of these youth, 1346 (53.8%) reported having ever used an ENDS product. Those most likely to have used ENDS were White males in their late teens. Those who reported ever using a conventional tobacco product were much more likely to have reported ever using ENDS (AOR= 19.96; 95% CI: 15.30–26.05). A number of perceptions related to nicotine-containing products, including product safety and health effects, were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of ENDS use.

Conclusions:
Certain sections of the US youth population have elevated odds of being ENDS ever users. As increasing evidence supports the need to combat ENDS use by youth, effectively targeted education and prevention campaigns will be necessary.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We extend our thanks to Shesh Rai for assistance with data analysis.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors have each completed and submitted an ICMJE form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. The authors declare that they have no competing interests, financial or otherwise, related to the current work. All authors report grants from the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration during the conduct of the study.
FUNDING
This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) under Award Numbers P50HL120163 and U54HL120163. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH, the Food and Drug Administration, or the American Heart Association.
PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW
Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
 
REFERENCES (36)
1.
Farrelly MC, Healton CG, Davis KC, Messeri P, Hersey JC, Haviland ML. Getting to the truth: Evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(6):901-907. doi:10.2105/ajph.92.6.901
 
2.
Murphy-Hoefer R, Davis KC, Beistle D, et al. Impact of the Tips from Former Smokers campaign on population-level smoking cessation, 2012–2015. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018;15. doi:10.5888/pcd15.180051
 
3.
Farrelly MC, Duke JC, Nonnemaker J, et al. Association between The Real Cost media campaign and smoking initiation among youths—United States, 2014–2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(02):47-50. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6602a2
 
4.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fast Facts: Smoking & Tobacco Use, 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/da.... Published February 6, 2019. Accessed August 9, 2019.
 
5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Smoking is down, but almost 38 million American adults still smoke. https://www.cdc.gov/media/rele.... Published January 18, 2018. Accessed July 31, 2019.
 
6.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in Current Cigarette Smoking Among High School Students and Adults, United States, 1965–2014. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/da.... Accessed July 31, 2019.
 
7.
Gentzke A, Creamer M, Cullen K, et al. Vital Signs: Tobacco product use among middle and high school students–United States, 2011-2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019(68):157-164. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6806e1
 
8.
Cullen K, Ambrose B, Gentzke A, Apelberg BJ, Jamal A, King B. Notes from the field: Use of electronic cigarettes and any tobacco product among middle and high school students–United States, 2011-2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(45):1276-1277. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6745a5
 
9.
Walley SC, Jenssen BP, Section on Tobacco Control. Electronic nicotine delivery systems. Pediatrics. 2015;136(5):1018-1026. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-3222
 
10.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Notes from the field: Electronic cigarette use among middle and high school students–United States, 2011-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(35):729-730. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/previ.... Published September, 2013. Accessed October 13, 2019.
 
11.
Essenmacher C, Naegle M, Baird C, et al. Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS): What nurses need to know. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2018;24(2):145-152. doi:10.1177/1078390317733802
 
12.
Wagoner KG, Cornacchione J, Wiseman KD, Teal R, Moracco KE, Sutfin EL. E-cigarettes, hookah pens and vapes: Adolescent and young adult perceptions of electronic nicotine delivery systems. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(10):2006-2012. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntw095
 
13.
Oh AY, Kacker A. Do electronic cigarettes impart a lower potential disease burden than conventional tobacco cigarettes? Review on e-cigarette vapor versus tobacco smoke. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(12):2702-2706. doi:10.1002/lary.24750
 
14.
Caponnetto P, Polosa R, Russo C, Leotta C, Campagna D. Successful smoking cessation with electronic cigarettes in smokers with a documented history of recurring relapses: A case series. J Med Case Rep. 2011;5(1):585. doi:10.1186/1752-1947-5-585
 
15.
Barbeau AM, Burda J, Siegel M. Perceived efficacy of e-cigarettes versus nicotine replacement therapy among successful e-cigarette users: A qualitative approach. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2013;8(1):5. doi:10.1186/1940-0640-8-5
 
16.
Olmedo P, Goessler W, Tanda S, et al. Metal concentrations in e-cigarette liquid and aerosol samples: The contribution of metallic coils. Environ Health Perspect. 2018;126(2):027010. doi:10.1289/EHP2175
 
17.
Dutra LM, Glantz SA. Electronic cigarettes and conventional cigarette use among U.S. adolescents: A cross-sectional study. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(7):610-617. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5488
 
18.
Hajek P, Phillips-Waller A, Przulj D, et al. A randomized trial of e-cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(7):629-637. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1808779
 
19.
Bold KW, Kong G, Camenga DR, et al. Trajectories of e-cigarette and conventional cigarette use among youth. Pediatrics. 2018;141(1):e20171832. doi:10.1542/peds.2017-1832
 
20.
Siegel DA, Jatlaoui TC, Koumans EH, et al. Update: Interim guidance for health care providers evaluating and caring for patients with suspected e-cigarette, or vaping, product use associated lung injury — United States, October 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019(68):919-927. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6841e3
 
21.
Timberlake DS, Nikitin D, Garcia-Cano J, Cino S, Savkina M, Pechmann C. Linking the content to demographic reach of online advertising of electronic nicotine delivery systems. Tob Control. 2018;27(4):463-469. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053473
 
22.
Arrazola RA, Singh T, Corey CG, et al. Tobacco use among middle and high school students–United States, 2011-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(14):381-385. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/previ.... Published April, 2015. Accessed October 13, 2019.
 
23.
Anand V, McGinty KL, O'Brien K, Guenthner G, Hahn E, Martin CA. E-cigarette use and beliefs among urban public high school students in North Carolina. J Adolesc Health. 2015;57(1):46-51. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.03.018
 
24.
Bostean G, Trinidad DR, McCarthy WJ. E-cigarette use among never-smoking California students. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(12):2423-2425. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302899
 
25.
Krishnan-Sarin S, Morean ME, Camenga DR, Cavallo DA, Kong G. E-cigarette use among high school and middle school adolescents in Connecticut. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(7):810-818. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu243
 
26.
Cavazos-Rehg PA, Krauss MJ, Sowles SJ, et al. Multiple levels of influence that impact youth tobacco use. Tob Regul Sci. 2016;2(2):106-122. doi:10.18001/trs.2.2.2
 
27.
Harlow AF, Stokes A, Brooks DR. Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differences in e-cigarette uptake among cigarette smokers: Longitudinal analysis of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019;21(10):1385-1393. doi:10.1093/ntr/nty141
 
28.
Nandi A, Glymour MM, Subramanian SV. Association among socioeconomic status, health behaviors, and all-cause mortality in the United States. Epidemiology. 2014;25(2):170-177. doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000000038
 
29.
Von Lampe K, Kurti M, Johnson J. “I'm gonna get me a loosie” understanding single cigarette purchases by adult smokers in a disadvantaged section of New York City. Prev Med Rep. 2018;12:182-185. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.09.016
 
30.
Wang T, Gentzke A, Sharapova S, Cullen K, Ambrose B, Jamal A. Tobacco product use among middle and high school students–United States 2011-2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(22):629-633. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6722a3
 
31.
Hess C, Antin T, Annechino R, Hunt G. Perceptions of e-cigarettes among black youth in California. Int J Environ Res and Public Health. 2017;14(1):60. doi:10.3390/ijerph14010060
 
32.
Cooper M, Case KR, Loukas A. E-cigarette use among Texas youth: Results from the 2014 Texas youth tobacco survey. Addict Beh. 2015;50:173-177. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.06.034
 
33.
Ambrose BK, Rostron BL, Johnson SE, et al. Perceptions of the relative harm of cigarettes and e-cigarettes among U.S. youth. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(2):S53-S60. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2014.04.016
 
34.
Glantz SA, Bareham DW. E-cigarettes: Use, effects on smoking, risks, and policy implications. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39(1):215-235. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013757
 
35.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Public health consequences of e-cigarettes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2018;493-540. doi:10.17226/24952
 
36.
Soneji S, Barrington-Trimis JL, Wills TA, et al. Association between initial use of e-cigarettes and subsequent cigarette smoking among adolescents and young adults. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(8):788. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1488
 
eISSN:2459-3087