School-level disadvantage and failed cessation treatment among adolescent smokers
More details
Hide details
Department of Population Health Sciences, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Virginia, United States
Milken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Prevention and Community and Health, George Washington University, Washington, United States
Schroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, District of Columbia,United States
Department of Biobehavioral, Health Pennsylvania State University, United States
Publish date: 2018-04-12
Submission date: 2017-11-03
Final revision date: 2018-03-16
Acceptance date: 2018-03-20
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2018;4(April):11
While understanding factors that lead to successful adolescent smoking cessation outcomes is necessary, it is also prudent to determine factors and conditions that contribute to failure to quit smoking. The present study posits that adolescents’ proximal environments, such as schools, may influence cessation treatment outcomes.

Using aggregated and geographically-referenced data from multi-year school-based cessation trials with 14-19 year olds seeking cessation in 5 States of the USA, the present study developed and applied a tobacco-specific socio-spatial model inclusive of Hierarchical Linear Modeling. Specifically, this novel approach spatially joined individual data files (n=8855) with measures of school (n=807) and county socio-economic factors. Once linked multi-level analyses explored the extent to which cessation treatment failure was explained by the interplay of individual, school and county-level factors. Treatment was deemed as failing to meet its primary goals if participants continued to smoke cigarettes, measured 3-months post baseline.

Ten per cent of the variation in cessation treatment failure was attributable to school-level variables. Adolescent smokers were more likely to experience failure to quit in: a) school districts with large percentages of the population having less than high-school education, and b) schools with a higher ratio of students to teachers. The strength of the relationship between cessation self-efficacy and treatment success was further weakened among adolescents attending schools with higher percentages of students eligible for free or reduced lunch programs.

Findings implicate school-level socio-economic disadvantage as a significant factor inhibiting cessation, regardless of adolescent self-efficacy to quit smoking. Understanding the interplay of proximal school environments and individual-level factors may provide insights to educators, policy makers and practitioners into the complexities that inhibit or strengthen an adolescent’s smoking cessation treatment experience.

Kimberly Horn   
Department of Population Health Sciences, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Virginia, United States
1. Singh T, Arrazola RA, Corey CG, Husten CG, Neff LJ, Homa DM, et al. Tobacco Use Among Middle and High School Students--United States, 2011-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(14):361-7. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6514a1
2. Arrazola RA, Kuiper NM, Dube SR. Patterns of current use of tobacco products among U.S. high school students for 2000-2012--findings from the National Youth Tobacco Survey. J Adolesc Health. 2014;54(1):54-60 e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.08.003
3. Cigarette smoking among adults and trends in smoking cessation-United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58(44):1227-32.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
4. Lee YO, Hebert CJ, Nonnemaker JM, Kim AE. Youth tobacco product use in the United States. Pediatrics. 2015;135 (3):409-15. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3202
5. West R, McEwen A, Bolling K, Owen L. Smoking cessation and smoking patterns in the general population: a 1-year follow-up. Addiction. 2001;96(6):891-902. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02735.x
6. Karpinski JP, Timpe EM, Lubsch L. Smoking cessation treatment for adolescents. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2010;15(4):249-63.
7. Milton MH, Maule CO, Yee SL, Backinger C, Malarcher AM, Husten CG. Youth tobacco cessation: A guide for making informed decisions. In Youth tobacco cessation: a guide for making informed decisions. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); 2004.
8. Marshall L, Schooley M, Ryan H, Cox P, Easton A, Healton C, et al. Youth tobacco surveillance-United States, 2001-2002. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006;55(3):1-56.
9. Curry SJ, Mermelstein RJ, Emery SL, Sporer AK, Berbaum ML, Campbell RT, et al. A national evaluation of community-based youth cessation programs: end of program and twelve-month outcomes. Am J Community Psychol. 2013;51(1-2):15-29. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9496-8
10. Sussman S. Effects of sixty six adolescent tobacco use cessation trials and seventeen prospective studies of self-initiated quitting. Tobacco Induced Diseases. 2002;1(1):35-81. doi: 10.1186/1617-9625-1-1
11. Lovato C, Watts A, Brown KS, Lee D, Sabiston C, Nykiforuk C, et al. School and community predictors of smoking: a longitudinal study of Canadian high schools. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(2):362-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300922
12. Borland BL, Rudolph JP. Relative effects of low socio-economic status, parental smoking and poor scholastic performance on smoking among high school students. Social Science & Medicine (1967). 1975;9(1):27-30. doi: 10.1016/0037-7856(75)90155-9
13. Aveyard P, Markham WA, Lancashire E, Almond J, Griffiths R, Cheng KK. Is inter-school variation in smoking uptake and cessation due to differences in pupil composition? A cohort study. Health Place. 2005;11(1):55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.02.001
14. Piontek D, Buehler A, Donath C, Floeter S, Rudolph U, Metz K, et al. School context variables and students' smoking. Testing a mediation model through multilevel analysis. Eur Addict Res. 2008; 14(1):53-60. doi: 10.1159/000110411
15. Piontek D, Buehler A, Rudolph U, Metz K, Kroeger C, Gradl S, et al. Social contexts in adolescent smoking: does school policy matter? Health Education Research. 2008; 23(6):1029-38. doi: 10.1093/her/cym063
16. Wen M, Van Duker H, Olson LM. Social contexts of regular smoking in adolescence: towards a multidimensional ecological model. J Adolesc. 2009; 32(3):671-92. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.008
17. Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Boden JM, Jenkin G. Childhood social disadvantage and smoking in adulthood: Results of a 25-year longitudinal study. Addiction. 2007;102(3):475-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01729.x
18. Non AL, Rewak M, Kawachi I, Gilman SE, Loucks EB, Appleton AA, et al. Childhood social disadvantage, cardiometabolic risk, and chronic disease in adulthood. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2014;180(3):263-71. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu127
19. Non AL, Román JC, Gross CL, Gilman SE, Loucks EB, Buka SL, et al. Early childhood social disadvantage is associated with poor health behaviours in adulthood. Annals of Human Biology. 2016; 43(2):144-53. doi: 10.3109/03014460.2015.1136357
20. Borland R, Young D, Coghill K, Zhang JY. The tobacco use management system: Analyzing tobacco control from a systems perspective. American Journal of Public Health. 2010;100(7):1229-36. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.165910
21. Best A, Clark PI, Leischow SJ, Trochim WM. Greater than the sum: Systems thinking in tobacco control. 2007. https://cancercontrol.cancer.g.... Accessed June 23,2017.
22. Silbereisen RK. Development and ecological context: History of the psychological science in a personal view and experience - An interview with Urie Bronfenbrenner. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht. 2006;53(1):63-71.
23. Davis R, Gilpin E, Loken B, Viswanath K, Wakefield M., eds. The Role of the Media in Promoting and Reducing Tobacco Use. Tobacco Control Monograph No.19. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. NIH Pub. No. 07-6242, 2009:357-428.
24. Evaluating ASSIST: A Blueprint for Understanding State-Level Tobacco Control. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; October 2006. Tobacco Control Monograph 17, National Institutes of Health publication 06-6058.
25. Pierce JP, Messer K, James LE, White MM, Kealey S, Vallone DM, et al. Camel No. 9 Cigarette-Marketing Campaign Targeted Young Teenage Girls. Pediatrics. 2010;125(4):619-26. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0607
26. Bailey SL, Ennett ST, Ringwalt CL. Potential mediators, moderators, or independent effects in the relationship between parents former and current cigarette use and their children's cigarette use. Addictive Behaviors. 1993;18(6):601-21. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(93)90015-2
27. Dalton MA, Sargent JD, Beach ML, Titus-Ernstoff L, Gibson JJ, Ahrens MB, et al. Effect of viewing smoking in movies on adolescent smoking initiation: a cohort study. Lancet. 2003;362(9380):281-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13970-0
28. Kobus K. Peers and adolescent smoking. Addiction. 2003;98 Suppl 1(s1):37-55. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.98.s1.4.x
29. Fagan P, Augustson E, Backinger CL, O'Connell ME, Vollinger Jr RE, Kaufman A, et al. Quit attempts and intention to quit cigarette smoking among young adults in the United States. American Journal of Public Health. 2007;97(8):1412-20. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2006.103697
30. Franks A, Kelder S, Dino G, Horn K, Gortmaker S, Wiecha J. School-based programs: lessons learned from CATCH, Planet Health, and Not-On-Tobacco. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2007;4(2, A33):1545-151.
31. Horn K, Dino G, Kalsekar I, Mody R. The impact of Not on Tobacco on teen smoking cessation end-of-program evaluation results, 1998 to 2003. Journal of Adolescent Research. 2005;20(6):640-61. doi: 10.1177/0743558405274891
32. Horn K, McGloin T, Dino G, Manzo K, McCracken L, Shorty L, et al. Quit and reduction rates for a pilot study of the American Indian Not On Tobacco (NOT) program. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005;2(4):A13.
33. Dino G, Horn K, Goldcamp J, Fernandes A, Kalsekar I, Massey C. A 2-year efficacy study of Not On Tobacco in Florida: An overview of program successes in changing teen smoking behavior. Preventive Medicine. 2001;33(6):600-5. doi:10.1006/pmed.2001.0932
34. Branstetter SA, Horn K, Dino G, Zhang J. Beyond quitting: predictors of teen smoking cessation, reduction and acceleration following a school-based intervention. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;99(1-3):160-8. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.07.011
35. Horn K, Dino G, Branstetter B, Zhang J, Kelley G, Noerachmanto N, et al. A profile of teen smokers who volunteered to participate in school-based smoking intervention. Tob Induc Dis. 2008; 4(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1617-9625-4-6
36. Mercincavage M, Branstetter SA, Muscat JE, Horn KA. Time to first cigarette predicts cessation outcomes in adolescent smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(12):1996-2004. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt087
37. Ellickson PL, McGuigan KA, Klein DJ. Predictors of late-onset smoking and cessation over 10 years. J Adolesc Health. 2001;29(2):101-8. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(00)00199
38. Emmons KM, Wechsler H, Dowdall G, Abraham M. Predictors of smoking among US college students. American Journal of Public Health. 1998;88(1):104-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.1.104
39. Joffe A, McNeely C, Colantuoni E, An MW, Wang W, Scharfstein D. Evaluation of school-based smoking-cessation interventions for self-described adolescent smokers. Pediatrics. 2009;124(2):e187-94. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2509
40. Lovato CY, Zeisser C, Campbell HS, Watts AW, Halpin P, Thompson M, et al. Adolescent smoking: effect of school and community characteristics. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(6):507-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.08.019
41. Tyas SL, Pederson LL. Psychosocial factors related to adolescent smoking: a critical review of the literature. Tob Control. 1998;7(4):409-20. doi:10.1136/tc.7.4.409
42. Zhu SH, Sun JC, Billings SC, Choi WS, Malarcher A. Predictors of smoking cessation in US adolescents. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1999;16(3):202-7. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00157-3
43. Audrain-McGovern J, Halbert CH, Rodriguez D, Epstein LH, Tercyak KP. Predictors of participation in a smoking cessation program among young adult smokers. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 2007;16(3):617-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0791
44. Curry SJ, Emery S, Sporer AK, Mermelstein R, Flay BR, Berbaum M, et al. A national survey of tobacco cessation programs for youths. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(1):171-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2005.065268
45. Mermelstein R. Teen smoking cessation. Tobacco Control. 2003. 12 Suppl 1: i25-i34. doi:org/10.1136/tc.12.suppl_1.i25
46. Niaura R, Abrams DB. Smoking cessation: progress, priorities, and prospectus. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70(3):494-509. doi: 10.1037//0022-006X.70.3.4
47. Orleans CT, Arkin EB, Backinger CL, Best A, Crossett L, Grossman D, et al. Youth Tobacco Cessation Collaborative and National Blueprint for Action. Am J Health Behav. 2003;27 Suppl 2(1):S103-19. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.27.1.s2.2
48. Sussman S, Sun P, Dent CW. A meta-analysis of teen cigarette smoking cessation. Health Psychol. 2006;25(5):549-57. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.5.549
49. Vink JM, Willemsen G, Boomsma DI. The association of current smoking behavior with the smoking behavior of parents, siblings, friends and spouses. Addiction. 2003;98(7):923-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00405.x
50. Spek V, Lemmens F, Chatrou M, van Kempen S, Pouwer F, Pop V. Development of a smoking abstinence self-efficacy questionnaire. Int J Behav Med. 2013;20(3):444-9. doi: 10.1007/s12529-012-9229-2
51. Etter J-F, Duc TV, Perneger TV. Validity of the Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence and of the Heaviness of Smoking Index among relatively light smokers. Addiction. 1999;94(2):269-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.94226910.x
52. Branstetter SA, Mercincavage M, Muscat JE. Time to first cigarette predicts 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) in adolescent regular and intermittent smokers, National Health and Nutrition and Examination Survey ( NHANES) 2007-10. Addiction. 2014;109(6):1005-12. doi: 10.1111/add.12515
53. Branstetter SA, Muscat JE. Time to first cigarette and serum cotinine levels in adolescent smokers: National health and nutrition examination survey, 2007-2010. Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2013;15(3):701-7. doi: 0.1093/ntr/nts189
54. Covey LS, Hu MC, Weissman J, Croghan I, Adler L, Winhusen T. Divergence by ADHD subtype in smoking cessation response to OROS-methylphenidate. Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2011;13(10):1003-8. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr087
55. Alexander C, Piazza M, Mekos D, Valente T. Peers, schools, and adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2001;29(1):22-30. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(01)00210-5
56. Conrad KM, Flay BR, Hill D. Why children start smoking cigarettes: predictors of onset. British Journal of Addiction. 1992;87(12):1711-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1992.tb02684.x
57. Ellickson PL, Bird CE, Orlando M, Klein DJ, McCaffrey DF. Social context and adolescent health behavior: Does school-level smoking prevalence affect students' subsequent smoking behavior? Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2003;44(4):525-35. doi: 10.2307/1519797
58. Kena G, Musu-Gillette L, Robinson J, Wang X, Rathbun A, Zhang J, et al. The Condition of Education 2015. NCES 2015-144. National Center for Education Statistics; 2015.
59. Raudenbush S, Bryk A, Congdon R. HLM 7.01 for Windows [Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling software] 2013.
60. Dino G, Kamal K, Horn K, Kalsekar I, Fernandes A. Stage of change and smoking cessation outcomes among adolescents. Addictive Behaviors. 2004;29(5):935-40. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.01.004
61. Horn K, Fernandes A, Dino G, Massey CJ, Kalsekar I. Adolescent nicotine dependence and smoking cessation outcomes. Addictive Behaviors. 2003;28(4):769-76. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00229-0
62. Sirin SR. Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research. 2005;75(3):417-53. doi: 10.3102/00346543075003417
63. Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Fidler JA, Munafò M. Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2012;1248(1):107-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x.
64. Mathur C, Erickson DJ, Stigler MH, Forster JL, Finnegan Jr JR. Individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status effects on adolescent smoking: A multilevel cohort-sequential latent growth analysis. American Journal of Public Health. 2013;103(3):543-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2012.300830
65. Siahpush M, McNeill A, Borland R, Fong GT. Socioeconomic variations in nicotine dependence, self-efficacy, and intention to quit across four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tobacco control. 2006 Jun 1;15(suppl 3):iii71-5. 10.1136/tc.2004.008763
66. Layte R, Whelan CT. Explaining social class inequalities in smoking: the role of education, self-efficacy, and deprivation. European Sociological Review. 2008 Mar 25;25(4):399-410. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcn022
67. Romanowich P, Mintz J, Lamb RJ. The relationship between self-efficacy and reductions in smoking in a contingency management procedure. Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology. 2009 Jun;17(3):139. doi:10.1037/a0015842
68. Carey K. Education Funding and Low-Income Children: A Review of Current Research. 2002. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
69. Murray C. Parent and teacher relationships as predictors of school engagement and functioning among low-income urban youth. Journal of Early Adolescence. 2009;29(3):376-404. doi:10.1177/0272431608322940
70. Roorda DL, Koomen HMY, Spilt JL, Oort FJ. The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students' school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research. 2011;81(4):493-529. doi:10.3102/0034654311421793
71. Barreto SM, Giatti L, Casado L, de Moura L, Crespo C, Malta D. Contextual factors associated with smoking among Brazilian adolescents. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(8):723-9. doi:10.1136/jech.2010.122549
72. Sancassiani F, Pintus E, Holte A, Paulus P, Moro MF, Cossu G, et al. Enhancing the emotional and social skills of the youth to promote their wellbeing and positive development: a systematic review of universal school-based randomized controlled trials. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health. 2015;11(1):21-40. doi: 10.2174/1745017901511010021
73. U.S. Census Bureau. A Compass for Understanding and Using American Community Survey Data. What General Data Users Need to Know. 2008, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
74. Leatherdale ST, Cole A. Examining the impact of changes in school tobacco control policies and programs on current smoking and susceptibility to future smoking among youth in the first two years of the COMPASS study: looking back to move forward. Tobacco Induced Diseases. 2015;13(1):8. doi:10.1186/s12971-015-0031-1