RESEARCH PAPER
Validity of the Fagerström test for nicotine dependence among persons with intellectual disabilities: Cross-sectional evidence from the POWER PID study
More details
Hide details
1
School of Management,
University Lille, CNRS, Villeneuve
d’Ascq, France
2
I.D.E. Dispositif d’habitat La
Liovette, Beauvais, France
3
HADéPas, Institut Catholique de
Lille, Lille, France
Submission date: 2026-02-18
Final revision date: 2026-03-31
Acceptance date: 2026-04-22
Publication date: 2026-07-26
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2026;12(July):45
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Tobacco use and the screening of nicotine dependence using
the Fagerström test among adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) is an
understudied public health issue. Despite lower reported prevalence relative to
the general population, methodological challenges – particularly the suitability
of self-reported tools – limit reliable measurement. This study assesses the
convergent validity of the Fagerström test for nicotine dependence (FTND) by
comparing it with exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), an objective biomarker of
recent smoking, in a sample of adults with ID.
Methods:
Data were collected from an observational cross-sectional validation
study during 2024, which investigates addictive behaviors, health indicators,
and physical activity among adults with ID in northern France. Nurses
administered a standardized questionnaire, including the FTND, and measured
exhaled CO using a portable analyzer. Associations were examined using
correlation analyses and univariable and multivariable linear regressions
controlling for sociodemographic and health variables.
Results:
Among 35 people who smoke, FTND scores were positively and strongly
correlated with exhaled CO (r=0.540, p<0.001). In adjusted regression models,
FTND remained a significantly associated factor of CO levels (0.60; 95% CI:
0.17–1.02), alongside age (0.065; 95% CI: 0.00–0.13), employment in sheltered
workshops (1.86; 95% CI: -0.07–3.78), and cognitive support needs (-1.62;
95% CI: -3.51–0.26). Analyses conducted on the full sample, including 68
people who do not smoke, yielded consistent results, with FTND remaining the
strongest predictor of exhaled CO.
Conclusions:
The results suggest evidence of validity of the FTND in adults
with ID, suggesting that self-report instruments can reliably estimate nicotine
dependence when administered with appropriate support. Nevertheless, the
interpretation of CO levels in adults with ID should account for age, cognitive
support needs, and contextual factors.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank all partner centers for their collaboration, including Les
Papillons Blancs de Dunkerque, UNAPEI 60 La Liovette, Les Papillons Blancs
d’Hazebrouck et Environs, and AFAPEI du Calaisis, as well as DKpulse and
Hauts-de-France Addictions. We extend our gratitude to Peggy Langlet,
Caroline Pigeon, Robin Turbot, Aurélie Heden, Antoine Desaegher, Sacha
Divry, Sébastien Nguyen, and Peggy Le Déaut (UNAPEI HDF), whose support
and involvement were essential to the implementation of the POWER PID
project. We also thank Ornella Sayumwe for her work as a research assistant
on the literature review and preliminary statistical analyses, carried out
during her final-year internship at the University of Lille.
FUNDING
This research was funded by the Institut de Recherche en Santé Publique
(IReSP) of Inserm, through the French National Fund for the Fight
Against Addictions. The project received support under grant agreement No.
2111097-00.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The data supporting this research are available from the authors on
reasonable request.
PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW
Not commissioned; externally peer-reviewed.