Research paper
Marketing activities of vape shops across racial/ethnic communities
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
Publish date: 2017-09-25
Submission date: 2016-05-11
Final revision date: 2017-06-08
Acceptance date: 2017-08-15
 
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2016;2(Supplement):12
KEYWORDS:
TOPICS:
ABSTRACT:
Introduction:
There has been a surge in the number of vape shops in the USA. Research on the marketing practices of e-cigarette manufacturers is scarce and even less known are the practices of vape shop retailers. Past research on tobacco marketing has shown differences in the amount and content of marketing material, based on a community’s demographic profile. This study examined marketing strategies in vape shops and explored differences among vape shops located in communities that differ by ethnic composition.

Methods:
Data was gathered in 2014 from a pilot-study on vape shops (n=77) in Los Angeles, which documented the characteristics of shops through employee interviews and in-store observations. Data were collected from shops located in communities that were predominantly, African-American (n=20), Hispanic (n=17), Korean (n=18), or non-Hispanic White (n=22).

Results:
Sixty-one percent of vape shops had advertisements (print ads and posters) for e-cigarettes and 84% offered discounts. Vape shops in Hispanic communities were more likely to have ethnic specific marketing material compared to shops in other communities. All the shops provided customers with free samples, however those in Korean and non-Hispanic White communities had a significantly higher prevalence of customer accessible free samples.

Conclusions:
Vape shop marketing practices differed by ethnic community. A large majority of shops provided free samples to their customers, a practice which is now banned by the FDA. It will be important to monitor how vape shops will adjust their marketing strategy because of this ban. Future research should expand on the findings presented here to provide regulators with further crucial information.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Robert Garcia   
University of Southern California, 2001 N Soto St, #312-17, 90032 Los Angeles, United States
 
REFERENCES (35):
1. Lee YO, Kim AE. “Vape shops” and “E-Cigarette lounges” open across the USA to promote ENDS. Tob Control. 2015;24(4):410-412. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051437.
2. Cheney M, Gowin M, Wann TF. Marketing Practices of Vapor Store Owners. Am J Public Health. April 2015:e1-e6. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302610.
3. Cheney MK, Gowin M, Wann TF. Vapor Store Owner Beliefs about Electronic Cigarette Regulation. Tob Regul Sci. 2015;1(3):227-235. doi:10.18001/TRS.1.3.4.
4. Carr ER. E-Cigarettes: Facts, Perceptions, and Marketing Messages - ProQuest. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18(1):112-116. Available at: http://search.proquest.com/openview/a7829ed88926a7f395fd088725def5f3/1?pq-origsite=gscholar. (Accessed July 2, 2015).
5. Wagoner KG, Song EY, Egan KL, et al. E-cigarette availability and promotion among retail outlets near college campuses in two southeastern states. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16(8):1150-1155. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu081.
6. Cheney MK, Gowin M, Wann TF. Vapor Store Owner Beliefs and Messages to Customers. Nicotine Tob Res. June 2015:ntv129-. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv129.
7. Kim AE, Arnold KY, Makarenko O. E-cigarette advertising expenditures in the U.S., 2011-2012. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(4):409-412. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.11.003.
8. Huang J, Kornfield R, Szczypka G, Emery SL. A cross-sectional examination of marketing of electronic cigarettes on Twitter. Tob Control. 2014;23(Supplement 3):iii26-iii30. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051551.
9. Sussman S, Garcia R, Cruz TB, Baezconde-garbanati L, Pentz MA, Unger JB. Consumers’ perceptions of vape shops in Southern California: an analysis of online Yelp reviews. Tobacco Induced Diseases. Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/s12971-014-0022-7.pdf. Published 2014. (Accessed April 23, 2015).
10. Allem J-P, Unger JB, Garcia R, Baezconde-Garbanati L, Sussman S. Tobacco Attitudes and Behaviors of Vape Shop Retailers in Los Angeles. Am J Health Behav. 2015;39(6):794-798. doi:10.5993/AJHB.39.6.7.
11. Mantey DS, Cooper MR, Clendennen SL, Pasch KE, Perry CL. E-Cigarette Marketing Exposure Is Associated With E-Cigarette Use Among US Youth. J Adolesc Heal. 2016;58(6):686-690. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.003.
12. Villanti AC, Rath JM, Williams VF, et al. Impact of Exposure to Electronic Cigarette Advertising on Susceptibility and Trial of Electronic Cigarettes and Cigarettes in US Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(5):1331-1339. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv235.
13. Cantrell J, Kreslake JM, Ganz O, et al. Marketing little cigars and cigarillos: advertising, price, and associations with neighborhood demographics. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(10):1902-1909. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301362.
14. Widome R, Brock B, Noble P, Forster JL. The relationship of neighborhood demographic characteristics to point-of-sale tobacco advertising and marketing. Ethn Health. 2013;18(2):136-151. doi:10.1080/13557858.2012.701273.
15. Feighery EC, Schleicher NC, Boley Cruz T, Unger JB. An examination of trends in amount and type of cigarette advertising and sales promotions in California stores, 2002-2005. Tob Control. 2008;17(2):93-98. doi:10.1136/tc.2007.022046.
16. Lee JGL, Henriksen L, Rose SW, Moreland-Russell S, Ribisl KM. A Systematic Review of Neighborhood Disparities in Point of Sale Tobacco Marketing. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(9):e8-e18. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302777.
17. Henriksen L, Schleicher NC, Dauphinee AL, Fortmann SP. Targeted advertising, promotion, and price for menthol cigarettes in California high school neighborhoods. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;14(1):116-121. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr122.
18. Henriksen L, Feighery EC, Schleicher NC, Haladjian HH, Fortmann SP. Reaching youth at the point of sale: cigarette marketing is more prevalent in stores where adolescents shop frequently. Tob Control. 2004;13(3):315-318. doi:10.1136/tc.2003.006577.
19. Siahpush M, Jones PR, Singh GK, Timsina LR, Martin J. The association of tobacco marketing with median income and racial/ethnic characteristics of neighbourhoods in Omaha, Nebraska. Tob Control. 2010;19(3):256-258. doi:10.1136/tc.2009.032185.
20. Yerger VB, Przewoznik J, Malone RE. Racialized geography, corporate activity, and health disparities: tobacco industry targeting of inner cities. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2007;18(4 Suppl):10-38. doi:10.1353/hpu.2007.0120.
21. Garcia R, Allem J, Baezconde-Garbanati L, Unger J, Sussman S. Employee and customer handling of nicotine-containing e-liquids in vape shops. Tob Prev Cessat. 2017;2(Supplement). doi:10.18332/tpc/67295.
22. Wakefield MA, Terry-McElrath YM, Chaloupka FJ, et al. Tobacco Industry Marketing at Point of Purchase After the 1998 MSA Billboard Advertising Ban. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(6):937-940. doi:10.2105/AJPH.92.6.937.
23. Celebucki CC, Diskin K. A longitudinal study of externally visible cigarette advertising on retail storefronts in Massachusetts before and after the Master Settlement Agreement. Tob Control. 2002;11:47-53. http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/tobaccocontrol/11/suppl_2/ii47.full.pdf. (accessed June 5, 2017).
24. Chung PJ, Garfield CF, Rathouz PJ, Lauderdale DS, Best D, Lantos J. Youth targeting by tobacco manufacturers since the Master Settlement Agreement. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21(2):254-263. doi:10.1377/HLTHAFF.21.2.254.
25. Loomis BR, Farrelly MC, Nonnemaker JM, Mann NH. Point of purchase cigarette promotions before and after the Master Settlement Agreement: exploring retail scanner data. Tob Control. 2006;15:140-142. doi:10.1136/tc.2005.011262.
26. Tan ASL, Bigman CA. E-cigarette awareness and perceived harmfulness: prevalence and associations with smoking-cessation outcomes. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(2):141-149. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2014.02.011.
27. Pokhrel P, Fagan P, Kehl L, Herzog TA. Receptivity to e-cigarette marketing, harm perceptions, and e-cigarette use. Am J Health Behav. 2015;39(1):121-131. doi:10.5993/AJHB.39.1.13.
28. Pepper JK, Emery SL, Ribisl KM, Brewer NT. How U.S. adults find out about electronic cigarettes: implications for public health messages. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16(8):1140-1144. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu060.
29. King BA, Alam S, Promoff G, Arrazola R, Dube SR. Awareness and ever-use of electronic cigarettes among U.S. adults, 2010-2011. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(9):1623-1627. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntt013.
30. Richardson A, Pearson J, Xiao H, Stalgaitis C, Vallone D. Prevalence, Harm Perceptions, and Reasons for Using Noncombustible Tobacco Products Among Current and Former Smokers. July 2014. Available at: http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301804. (Accessed March 14, 2016).
31. Choi K, Fabian L, Mottey N, Corbett A, Forster J. Young adults’ favorable perceptions of snus, dissolvable tobacco products, and electronic cigarettes: findings from a focus group study. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(11):2088-2093. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300525.
32. Choi K, Forster J. Characteristics Associated With Awareness, Perceptions, and Use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Among Young US Midwestern Adults. February 2013. Available at: http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300947. (accessed March 14, 2016).
33. Ambrose BK, Rostron BL, Johnson SE, et al. Perceptions of the relative harm of cigarettes and e-cigarettes among U.S. youth. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(2 Suppl 1):S53-60. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2014.04.016.
34. Sutfin EL, McCoy TP, Morrell HER, Hoeppner BB, Wolfson M. Electronic cigarette use by college students. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;131(3):214-221. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.05.001.
35. Grier SA, Kumanyika S. Targeted Marketing and Public Health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31(1):349-369. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103607.
eISSN:2459-3087