RESEARCH PAPER
Taxing tobacco for better health and higher public revenues: A simulation-based analysis from Serbia
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Economic Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia
Submission date: 2026-03-03
Final revision date: 2026-04-13
Acceptance date: 2026-05-06
Publication date: 2026-07-13
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2026;12(July):39
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Tobacco taxation is widely recognized as one of the most effective
policy measures for reducing tobacco use and saving lives. The aim of this study
is to estimate the fiscal and public health effects of increasing cigarette excise
taxes in Serbia, an upper middle-income country with historically high smoking
prevalence and increasing affordability in recent years.
Methods:
A simulation-based analysis was conducted to estimate the effects of
an annual increase in the specific excise tax per cigarette pack in Serbia.
The baseline year was 2023, with projections for two years. Changes in
cigarette consumption were estimated using price elasticity, income elasticity,
and cross-price elasticity derived from previous research. The model assessed
impacts on cigarette consumption, government revenues, smoking prevalence,
smoking-attributable premature mortality, and youth smoking initiation, under
assumptions of full price pass-through, a constant illicit market share, and no
inflation.
Results:
An increase in cigarette excise taxes is associated with higher retail
prices (10–11%) and reductions in cigarette consumption (-4.7% in the first
year and -5.3% in the second year) and smoking prevalence (from 37.9% at
baseline to 35.8%). Youth smoking initiation declined across all age groups, with
>17000 individuals deterred from initiating smoking. Government revenues
from tobacco increased over the observed period, as higher tax revenues per
pack outweighed reductions in sales volumes, with excise tax revenues rising
by about 7% annually. Declines in smoking prevalence resulted, among other
effects, in reductions in premature smoking-attributable mortality, with 320
premature deaths avoided in the first year and 678 in the second year.
Conclusions:
The findings indicate that increasing cigarette excise taxes in Serbia
can yield substantial public health benefits while strengthening government
revenues. Further research accounting for substitution toward other tobacco
or nicotine products would strengthen the evidence base and provide a more
comprehensive assessment of the health and fiscal impacts of tobacco tax
policies.
ABBREVIATIONS
EU: European Union, EUR: Euro, GYTS: Global Youth Tobacco Survey, IARC: International Agency for Research on Cancer, ICD-10: International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, IMF: International Monetary Fund, RSD: Serbian Dinar, SORS: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, STC-SEE: Survey on Tobacco Consumption in Southeastern Europe, UIC: University of Illinois Chicago, VAT: Value-Added Tax, WHO: World Health Organization
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research is funded by the University of Illinois Chicago’s (UIC) Institute
for Health Research and Policy to conduct economic research on tobacco
taxation in Serbia. UIC is a partner of the Bloomberg Philanthropies’
Initiative to Reduce Tobacco Use. The views expressed in this document
cannot be attributed to, nor can they be considered to represent, the
views of UIC, the Institute for Health Research and Policy, or Bloomberg
Philanthropies.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors have each completed and submitted an ICMJE form for
disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. The authors declare that they
have no competing interests, financial or otherwise, related to the current
work. O. Jovanović and J. Zubović report that since the initial planning of
the work, received support from the Institute for Public Health and Research
University of Illinois in Chicago, USA (Funding for research and honoraria)
and from the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation
Republic of Serbia (Funding for research and honoraria) and in the past
36 months received support for attending meetings and/or travel from the
Institute for Public Health and Research University of Illinois in Chicago,
USA (Support was provided in order to attend workshops organized by UIC
to disseminate knowledge on the topic) and from the Ministry of Science,
Technological Development and Innovation Republic of Serbia (Support was
provide to attend the conference in order to present the results of the study.)
J. Zubović reports that in the past 36 months has leadership/fiduciary role as
an ENSP member.
FUNDING
This research was funded by the University of Illinois Chicago’s (UIC)
Institute for Health Research and Policy and the Ministry of Science,
Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia.
ETHICAL APPROVAL AND INFORMED CONSENT
Ethical approval and informed consent were not required for this study.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The data supporting this research are available from the authors on
reasonable request.
AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS
OJ: wrote the manuscript with support from JZ. JS: prepared graphics and
sorted the data. All three authors read and approved the final version of the
manuscript.
PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW
Not commissioned; externally peer-reviewed.
SUPPLEMENTARY FILE DISCLAIMER
The content has been provided by the author(s) and has not been reviewed,
verified, or endorsed by European Publishing. It may not have undergone
peer review. The views, opinions, and recommendations expressed are solely
those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of European
Publishing. European Publishing accepts no responsibility or liability for any
consequences arising from the use of, or reliance on, this content.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
World Health Organization. WHO global report on trends in prevalence of tobacco use 2000–2024 and projections 2025–2030; 2025. Accessed May 6, 2026.
https://www.who.int/publicatio...
2.
Zubović J, Vladisavljević M, Đukić M, et al. Survey on tobacco products consumption in Southeastern Europe (STC-SEE). Institute of Economic Sciences; 2019. Accessed January 28, 2026.
http://dcs.ien.bg.ac.rs/61
3.
Vladisavljević M, Zubović J, Jovanović O, et al. Crowding-out effect of tobacco consumption in Serbia. Tob Control. 2024;33(suppl 2):s88–s94. doi:10.1136/tc-2022-057727
4.
Zubović J, Vukmirović V, Jovanović O. Tobacco taxation in Eastern Europe – landscape study. Institute of Economic Sciences; 2026. Accessed May 6, 2026.
https://ien.bg.ac.rs/cms_uploa...
5.
Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Fidler JA, Munafò M. Socioeconomic status and smoking: A review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1248(1):107–123. doi:10.1111/j.1749-
6632.2011.06202.x
7.
Chaloupka FJ, Yurekli A, Fong GT. Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy. Tob Control. 2012;21(2):172–180. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050417
8.
Jovanović O, Zubović J. Smokers’ attitudes on control policies and an overview of the current state in Serbia. Tob Prev Cessation. 2023;9(suppl 2):A36. doi:10.18332/tpc/172656
9.
Institute of Public Health of Serbia; Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia. The 2019 Serbian National Health Survey. Belgrade, Serbia; 2021. Accessed January 29, 2026.
https://www.stat.gov.rs/en-US/...
10.
World Health Organization. Serbia 2013: Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) Fact Sheet (Ages 13–15). Updated July 31, 2015. Accessed January 29, 2026.
https://www.who.int/publicatio...
11.
Zubović J, Vladisavljević M. Impact of tobacco excise increases on cigarette consumption and government revenues in Southeastern Europe countries. Institute of Economic Sciences; 2019. Accessed May 6, 2026.
https://eprints.uklo.edu.mk/id...
12.
Tauras JA, Peck RM, Chaloupka FJ. The role of retail prices and promotions in determining cigarette brand market shares. Rev Ind Organ. 2006;28(3):253–284. doi:10.1007/s11151-006-0016-6
13.
National Bank of Serbia. Average annual exchange rate of the dinar (RSD) against the euro (EUR) for 2023; Accessed February 26, 2026.
https://www.nbs.rs/export/site...
14.
Borović Z, Mićić L, Gligorić D, Preradović Kulovac D. Bosnia and Herzegovina tobacco excise tax modeling. Economics for Health Working Paper; 2023. Accessed May 6, 2026.
https://www.economicsforhealth...
15.
Cizmovic M, Mugosa A, Kovacevic M, Lakovic T. Effectiveness of tax policy changes in Montenegro: smoking behaviour by socioeconomic status. Tob Control. 2022;31(suppl 2):s124–s132. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056876
16.
Đukić M, Jovanović O, Vladisavljević M, Jolović N, Zubović J. Tobacco tax avoidance and evasion in Serbia, 2019. Institute of Economic Sciences; 2021. Accessed January 30, 2026.
https://ien.bg.ac.rs/cms_uploa...
17.
Vladisavljević M, Đukić M, Zubović J, Jovanović O, Jolović N. Tobacco Tax Evasion in Southeastern Europe: Tax Evasion Prevalence and Evasion Determinants.
Institute of Economic Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia; 2021. Accessed May 6, 2026.
https://ien.bg.ac.rs/cms_uploa...
18.
Zubović J, Jovanović O, Nedeljković B. Distributional impacts of tobacco excise taxes in Serbia. Nicotine Tob Res. 2024;27(1):106–113. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntae175
19.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. Volume 14: Effectiveness of Tax and Price Policies for Tobacco Control. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2011:201–258. Accessed May 6, 2026.
https://publications.iarc.who....
20.
Goodchild M, Perucic AM, Nargis N. Modelling the impact of raising tobacco taxes on public health and finance. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94(4):250–257. doi:10.2471/BLT.15.164707
21.
Bardach A, Casarini A, Rodriguez Cairoli F, et al. The estimated benefits of increasing cigarette prices through taxation on the burden of disease and economic burden of smoking in Nigeria: a modeling study. PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0264757. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0264757
22.
Doherty J. Increasing tax revenue and its impact on financing public health care in South Africa. RESYST Working Paper No. 6. University of the Witwatersrand; 2014. Accessed May 6, 2026.
https://assets.publishing.serv...
23.
Matsubayashi K, Tabuchi T, Iso H. Tobacco price increase and successful smoking cessation for two or more years in Japan. Nicotine Tob Res. 2021;23(4):716–723. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntaa178
24.
Ross H, Blecher E, Yan L, Hyland A. Do cigarette prices motivate smokers to quit? Evidence from the United States and Canada. Addiction. 2011;106(3):609–619. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03192.x
25.
Tsai YW, Yang CL, Chen CS, Liu TC, Chen PF. The effect of Taiwan’s tax-induced increases in cigarette prices on brand-switching and the consumption of cigarettes. Health Econ. 2005;14(6):627–641. doi:10.1002/hec.972
26.
Parks MJ, Patrick ME, Levy DT, Thrasher JF. Cigarette pack price and its within-person association with smoking initiation, smoking progression, and disparities among young adults. Nicotine Tob Res. 2022;24(4):519–528. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntab210
27.
Kostova D, Ross H, Blecher E, Markowitz S. Is youth smoking responsive to cigarette prices? Evidence from low- and middle-income countries. Tob Control. 2011;20(6):419–424. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.038786
28.
Filby S, van Walbeek C. Cigarette prices and smoking among youth in 16 African countries: evidence from the Global Youth Tobacco Survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2022;24(suppl 1):s16–s24. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntac017