RESEARCH PAPER
Figure from article: Taxing tobacco for better...
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Tobacco taxation is widely recognized as one of the most effective policy measures for reducing tobacco use and saving lives. The aim of this study is to estimate the fiscal and public health effects of increasing cigarette excise taxes in Serbia, an upper middle-income country with historically high smoking prevalence and increasing affordability in recent years.

Methods:
A simulation-based analysis was conducted to estimate the effects of an annual increase in the specific excise tax per cigarette pack in Serbia. The baseline year was 2023, with projections for two years. Changes in cigarette consumption were estimated using price elasticity, income elasticity, and cross-price elasticity derived from previous research. The model assessed impacts on cigarette consumption, government revenues, smoking prevalence, smoking-attributable premature mortality, and youth smoking initiation, under assumptions of full price pass-through, a constant illicit market share, and no inflation.

Results:
An increase in cigarette excise taxes is associated with higher retail prices (10–11%) and reductions in cigarette consumption (-4.7% in the first year and -5.3% in the second year) and smoking prevalence (from 37.9% at baseline to 35.8%). Youth smoking initiation declined across all age groups, with >17000 individuals deterred from initiating smoking. Government revenues from tobacco increased over the observed period, as higher tax revenues per pack outweighed reductions in sales volumes, with excise tax revenues rising by about 7% annually. Declines in smoking prevalence resulted, among other effects, in reductions in premature smoking-attributable mortality, with 320 premature deaths avoided in the first year and 678 in the second year.

Conclusions:
The findings indicate that increasing cigarette excise taxes in Serbia can yield substantial public health benefits while strengthening government revenues. Further research accounting for substitution toward other tobacco or nicotine products would strengthen the evidence base and provide a more comprehensive assessment of the health and fiscal impacts of tobacco tax policies.
ABBREVIATIONS
EU: European Union, EUR: Euro, GYTS: Global Youth Tobacco Survey, IARC: International Agency for Research on Cancer, ICD-10: International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, IMF: International Monetary Fund, RSD: Serbian Dinar, SORS: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, STC-SEE: Survey on Tobacco Consumption in Southeastern Europe, UIC: University of Illinois Chicago, VAT: Value-Added Tax, WHO: World Health Organization
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research is funded by the University of Illinois Chicago’s (UIC) Institute for Health Research and Policy to conduct economic research on tobacco taxation in Serbia. UIC is a partner of the Bloomberg Philanthropies’ Initiative to Reduce Tobacco Use. The views expressed in this document cannot be attributed to, nor can they be considered to represent, the views of UIC, the Institute for Health Research and Policy, or Bloomberg Philanthropies.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors have each completed and submitted an ICMJE form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. The authors declare that they have no competing interests, financial or otherwise, related to the current work. O. Jovanović and J. Zubović report that since the initial planning of the work, received support from the Institute for Public Health and Research University of Illinois in Chicago, USA (Funding for research and honoraria) and from the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation Republic of Serbia (Funding for research and honoraria) and in the past 36 months received support for attending meetings and/or travel from the Institute for Public Health and Research University of Illinois in Chicago, USA (Support was provided in order to attend workshops organized by UIC to disseminate knowledge on the topic) and from the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation Republic of Serbia (Support was provide to attend the conference in order to present the results of the study.) J. Zubović reports that in the past 36 months has leadership/fiduciary role as an ENSP member.
FUNDING
This research was funded by the University of Illinois Chicago’s (UIC) Institute for Health Research and Policy and the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia.
ETHICAL APPROVAL AND INFORMED CONSENT
Ethical approval and informed consent were not required for this study.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The data supporting this research are available from the authors on reasonable request.
AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS
OJ: wrote the manuscript with support from JZ. JS: prepared graphics and sorted the data. All three authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW
Not commissioned; externally peer-reviewed.
SUPPLEMENTARY FILE DISCLAIMER

The content has been provided by the author(s) and has not been reviewed, verified, or endorsed by European Publishing. It may not have undergone peer review. The views, opinions, and recommendations expressed are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of European Publishing. European Publishing accepts no responsibility or liability for any consequences arising from the use of, or reliance on, this content.

REFERENCES (28)
1.
World Health Organization. WHO global report on trends in prevalence of tobacco use 2000–2024 and projections 2025–2030; 2025. Accessed May 6, 2026. https://www.who.int/publicatio...
 
2.
Zubović J, Vladisavljević M, Đukić M, et al. Survey on tobacco products consumption in Southeastern Europe (STC-SEE). Institute of Economic Sciences; 2019. Accessed January 28, 2026. http://dcs.ien.bg.ac.rs/61
 
3.
Vladisavljević M, Zubović J, Jovanović O, et al. Crowding-out effect of tobacco consumption in Serbia. Tob Control. 2024;33(suppl 2):s88–s94. doi:10.1136/tc-2022-057727
 
4.
Zubović J, Vukmirović V, Jovanović O. Tobacco taxation in Eastern Europe – landscape study. Institute of Economic Sciences; 2026. Accessed May 6, 2026. https://ien.bg.ac.rs/cms_uploa...
 
5.
Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Fidler JA, Munafò M. Socioeconomic status and smoking: A review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1248(1):107–123. doi:10.1111/j.1749- 6632.2011.06202.x
 
6.
World Health Organization. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2003. Accessed January 30, 2026. https://iris.who.int/handle/10...
 
7.
Chaloupka FJ, Yurekli A, Fong GT. Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy. Tob Control. 2012;21(2):172–180. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050417
 
8.
Jovanović O, Zubović J. Smokers’ attitudes on control policies and an overview of the current state in Serbia. Tob Prev Cessation. 2023;9(suppl 2):A36. doi:10.18332/tpc/172656
 
9.
Institute of Public Health of Serbia; Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia. The 2019 Serbian National Health Survey. Belgrade, Serbia; 2021. Accessed January 29, 2026. https://www.stat.gov.rs/en-US/...
 
10.
World Health Organization. Serbia 2013: Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) Fact Sheet (Ages 13–15). Updated July 31, 2015. Accessed January 29, 2026. https://www.who.int/publicatio...
 
11.
Zubović J, Vladisavljević M. Impact of tobacco excise increases on cigarette consumption and government revenues in Southeastern Europe countries. Institute of Economic Sciences; 2019. Accessed May 6, 2026. https://eprints.uklo.edu.mk/id...
 
12.
Tauras JA, Peck RM, Chaloupka FJ. The role of retail prices and promotions in determining cigarette brand market shares. Rev Ind Organ. 2006;28(3):253–284. doi:10.1007/s11151-006-0016-6
 
13.
National Bank of Serbia. Average annual exchange rate of the dinar (RSD) against the euro (EUR) for 2023; Accessed February 26, 2026. https://www.nbs.rs/export/site...
 
14.
Borović Z, Mićić L, Gligorić D, Preradović Kulovac D. Bosnia and Herzegovina tobacco excise tax modeling. Economics for Health Working Paper; 2023. Accessed May 6, 2026. https://www.economicsforhealth...
 
15.
Cizmovic M, Mugosa A, Kovacevic M, Lakovic T. Effectiveness of tax policy changes in Montenegro: smoking behaviour by socioeconomic status. Tob Control. 2022;31(suppl 2):s124–s132. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056876
 
16.
Đukić M, Jovanović O, Vladisavljević M, Jolović N, Zubović J. Tobacco tax avoidance and evasion in Serbia, 2019. Institute of Economic Sciences; 2021. Accessed January 30, 2026. https://ien.bg.ac.rs/cms_uploa...
 
17.
Vladisavljević M, Đukić M, Zubović J, Jovanović O, Jolović N. Tobacco Tax Evasion in Southeastern Europe: Tax Evasion Prevalence and Evasion Determinants. Institute of Economic Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia; 2021. Accessed May 6, 2026. https://ien.bg.ac.rs/cms_uploa...
 
18.
Zubović J, Jovanović O, Nedeljković B. Distributional impacts of tobacco excise taxes in Serbia. Nicotine Tob Res. 2024;27(1):106–113. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntae175
 
19.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. Volume 14: Effectiveness of Tax and Price Policies for Tobacco Control. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2011:201–258. Accessed May 6, 2026. https://publications.iarc.who....
 
20.
Goodchild M, Perucic AM, Nargis N. Modelling the impact of raising tobacco taxes on public health and finance. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94(4):250–257. doi:10.2471/BLT.15.164707
 
21.
Bardach A, Casarini A, Rodriguez Cairoli F, et al. The estimated benefits of increasing cigarette prices through taxation on the burden of disease and economic burden of smoking in Nigeria: a modeling study. PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0264757. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0264757
 
22.
Doherty J. Increasing tax revenue and its impact on financing public health care in South Africa. RESYST Working Paper No. 6. University of the Witwatersrand; 2014. Accessed May 6, 2026. https://assets.publishing.serv...
 
23.
Matsubayashi K, Tabuchi T, Iso H. Tobacco price increase and successful smoking cessation for two or more years in Japan. Nicotine Tob Res. 2021;23(4):716–723. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntaa178
 
24.
Ross H, Blecher E, Yan L, Hyland A. Do cigarette prices motivate smokers to quit? Evidence from the United States and Canada. Addiction. 2011;106(3):609–619. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03192.x
 
25.
Tsai YW, Yang CL, Chen CS, Liu TC, Chen PF. The effect of Taiwan’s tax-induced increases in cigarette prices on brand-switching and the consumption of cigarettes. Health Econ. 2005;14(6):627–641. doi:10.1002/hec.972
 
26.
Parks MJ, Patrick ME, Levy DT, Thrasher JF. Cigarette pack price and its within-person association with smoking initiation, smoking progression, and disparities among young adults. Nicotine Tob Res. 2022;24(4):519–528. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntab210
 
27.
Kostova D, Ross H, Blecher E, Markowitz S. Is youth smoking responsive to cigarette prices? Evidence from low- and middle-income countries. Tob Control. 2011;20(6):419–424. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.038786
 
28.
Filby S, van Walbeek C. Cigarette prices and smoking among youth in 16 African countries: evidence from the Global Youth Tobacco Survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2022;24(suppl 1):s16–s24. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntac017
 
eISSN:2459-3087
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top