Research paper
 
CC-BY-NC 4.0
 
 

Assessing demographic differences in decisional balance for smoking prevention and temptations to try smoking among adolescent subgroups

Marie Aline Sillice 1  ,  
 
1
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Centers for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital , Providence, USA
2
Cancer Prevention Research Center and Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, USA
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2017;3(May):14
Publish date: 2017-05-11
Submission date: 2016-08-05
Final revision date: 2017-04-10
Acceptance date: 2017-04-19
KEYWORDS:
TOPICS:
 
ABSTRACT:
Introduction:
Cigarette smoking initiation remains prevalent in adolescence. Effective prevention methods are needed to dissuade this behavior. Demographic factors are identified as important risk factors in the developmental nature of smoking in adolescence. The current study investigates potential demographic differences for two new trans-theoretical model measures, the Decisional Balance Inventory (pros and cons) for Smoking Prevention and the Temptationsto Try Smoking Scale.

Methods:
A sample of 6th grade Rhode Island students from 20 middle schools (N = 4151) who were participating in a longitudinal and computer-delivered intervention for substance abuse prevention was assessed on these measures at baseline. Three MANOVA tests were conducted to assess the impact of race (White vs. Non-White), ethnicity (Hispanic vs. Non-Hispanic) and gender (male vs female).

Results:
Significant effects for race and ethnicity were found for Decisional Balance and Temptations to Try Smoking. For race, Whites reported lesser pros (p <.0001) and Non-Whites reported higher cons (p <.0001) and temptations to try smoking (p <.0001). Differences for ethnicity showed that Hispanics were higher on pros (p <.0001) and temptations to try smoking (p <.0001) than Non-Hispanics. Non-Hispanics reported higher cons (p <.0001). Gender differences were noted only for temptations to try smoking, and showed females were higher on this construct than males (p <.0001). The effect sizes were .01 or below.

Conclusions:
The results did not demonstrate a strong association between these demographics and constructs, suggesting that tailored prevention methods based solely on these factors may not dissuade smoking in this group.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Marie Aline Sillice   
1. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Centers for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, 164 Summit Street, 02906 Providence, United States
 
REFERENCES (40):
1. Surgeon General Report— The Health Consequences of Smoking. 50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2014. Available at: http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/50-years-of-progress/full-report.pdf. (accessed January 2016)
2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2012.
3. Singh T, Arrazola RA, Corey CG, et al. Tobacco use among middle and high school students — United States, 2011–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016; 65:361– 367. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6514a1.
4. Fryar CD, Merino MC, Hirsch R, Porter KS. Smoking, alcohol use, and illicit drug use.reported by adolescents aged 12-17 years: United States, 1999-2004 Natl Health Stat 2009 15, 1-28. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr015.pdf. (accessed May 2015)
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tobacco product use among middle and high school students —United States, 2011 and 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013; 62(45): 893-897.
6. Chen P, Jacobson KC. Developmental trajectories of substance use from early adolescence to young adulthood: gender and racial/ ethnic differences. J Adolesc Health. 2011; 50(2): 154-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.05.013.
7. Tucker JS, Ellison PL, Orlando M, et al. Substance use trajectories from early adolescence to adulthood. A comparison for smoking, binge drinking and marijuana use. J Drug Issues. 2005; 35(2): 307-331.
8. White AR, Pendina R. Chen PH. Developmental trajectories of cigarette use from early adolescence into young adulthood. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002; 65:167-178.
9. The 2004 Surgeon General’s Report—The Health Consequences of Smoking. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/2004/pdfs/chapter1.pdf. (accessed January 2016).
10. DuRant RH, Smith JA, Kreiter SR, Krowchuk DP. The relationship between early age of onset of initial substance use and engaging in multiple health risk behaviors among young adolescents. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2010; 36: 123–129.
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fact sheet--CDC health disparities and inequalities report__US 2011. Available at: http:// www.cdc.gov/minorityhealth/reports/CHDIR11/FactSheet.pdf. (accessed March 2015).
12. Davis KC, Nonnemaker JM, Asfaw HA, Vallone DM. Racial/ethnic differences in perceived smoking prevalence: evidence from a national survey of teens. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010; 7, 4152-4168. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7124152.
13. Wallace JW, Vaughn MG, Bachman JG, et al. Race/ethnicity,socioeconomic factors, and smoking among early adolescent girls in the United States. Drug and Alcohol Depend. 2009; 104 (1): S42- S49.
14. Kandel BD, Kiros GE, Schaffran C, Hu MC. Racial/ethnic differences in cigarette smoking initiation and progression to daily smoking: A multilevel analysis. Am J Public Health. 2004; 94(1), 128-135.
15. Mermestein R. Ethnicity, gender and risk factors for smoking initiation: An overview. Nicotine Tob Res. 1999; 1(2): S39-S43.
16. Donovan JC. Adolescent alcohol initiation: A review of psychosocial risk factors. J Adolesc Health. 2004; 3:529.e7–529.e18.
17. Brown AK, Moodie C, Hastings G, et al. The association of normative perceptions with adolescent smoking intentions. J Adolesc. 2010; 33: 603-614.
18. Garrett BE, Dube SR, Trosclair AT, Caraballo RS, Pechacek TF. Cigarette smoking- United States, 1965-2008. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011; 60 (Suppl.): 109-113. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/other/su6001.pdf (accessed May 2015).
19. Kline RB. Beyond Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2004.
20. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
21. Cohen J. Quantitative method in psychology: A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992; 112(1), 155-159.
22. DeVellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and Applications (Applied Social Research Methods Series, 26). London: Sage, 1991.
23. Noar SM. The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Struct Equ Modeling. 2003; 10(4): 622-647.
24. Dar R, Frenk H. Can one puff really make an adolescent addicted to nicotine? A critical review of the literature. Harm Reduct J. 2010; 7:28. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-7-28.
25. Kraemer HC, Stice E, Kazdin A, et al. How do risk factors work together? Mediators, moderators, and independent, overlapping, and proxy risk factors. Am J Psychiatr. 2001;15, 848-856. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.6.848.
26. Plummer BA, Velicer WF, Redding CA, et al. Stage of change, decisional balance, and temptations for smoking: Measurement and validation in a large, school-based population of adolescents. Addict Behav. 2001; 26: 551-571.
27. Velicer WF, DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO, Brandenberg N.Decisional balance measure for assessing and predicting smoking status. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985;48:1279-1289.
28. Plummer BA, Velicer WF, Redding CA, et al. Stage of change,decisional balance, and temptations for smoking: Measurement and validation in a large, school-based population of adolescents. Addict Behav. 2001; 26: 551-571.
29. Velicer WF, Diclemente CC, Rossi JS, Prochaska JO. Relapse situations and self-efficacy: An integrative model. Addict Behav. 1990; 15: 271-283.
30. Ding L, Pallonen U E, Velicer WF. Temptations to smoke and stages of change among adolescent smokers (Abstract). Ann Behav Med.1995; 17: S087.
31. Hall KL, Rossi JS. (2008). Meta-analytic examination of the strong and weak principles across 48 health behaviors. Prev Med. 2008;46(3): 266-274. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.11.006.
32. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol. 1982;37(2):122 147.
33. Velicer WF, Redding CA, Paiva AL, Mauriello, L.M., et al. Multiplebehavior interventions to prevent substance abuse and increase energy balance behaviors in middle school students. Transl Behav Med: Practice, Policy and Research. 2013, 3:82–93. doi: 10.1007/s13142-013-0197-0.
34. McGee H, Brick L, Babbin SF, et al. Psychometric assessment of the decisional balance inventory for smoking prevention in middle school students (Abstract). Ann Behav Med. 2012; 41: S213.
35. McGee HA, Babbin SF, Redding CA, et al. Prevention of smoking in middle school students: Psychometric assessment of the temptations to try smoking scale. Addict Behav. 2011; 37(4): 521-523. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-37.
36. Harlow LL. The Essence of Multivariate Thinking. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence. Erlbraum Associates Publishers, 2005.
37. Asbridge M, Tanner J, Wortley S. Ethno-specific patterns of adolescent tobacco use and the mediating role of acculturation, peer smoking, and sibling smoking. Addiction. 2005; 100: 1340-1351. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01165.x.
38. Weiss JW, Mouttapa M, Cen S, et al. Longitudinal effects of hostility, depression, and bullying on adolescents smoking initiation. J Adolesc Health. 2010; 48 (6): 591-596. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.09.012.
39. Goodman E, Capitman J. Depressive symptoms and cigarette smoking among teens. Pediatrics. 2000; 106(4):748-758.
40. Substance abuse and mental health services administration (SAMHSA), HHS, results from the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, NSDUH: Volume I summary of national findings. Available at: http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2k9NSDUH/2k9ResultsP.pdf. (accessed on March 2015)
eISSN:2459-3087