RESEARCH PAPER
Comparative analysis of diet and tobacco use among households in Bangladesh
 
More details
Hide details
1
US National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, United States
2
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Mark Parascandola   

US National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-9761, United States
Publish date: 2019-03-28
Submission date: 2018-10-29
Final revision date: 2018-12-10
Acceptance date: 2019-03-13
 
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2019;5(March):12
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
While studies from developed countries have reported dietary differences between tobacco users and non-users, less is known about the influence of tobacco on diet in developing countries where malnutrition is a major public health challenge.

Methods:
In this study we used the nationally representative Household Income Expenditure Survey 2010 from Bangladesh. Detailed household-level food consumption data including both ethnic and region-specific foods were collected over 14 days, consisting of 7 visits each collecting two days of dietary recall information.

Results:
Out of 12240 households, 2061 consumed smoking tobacco only (16.8%), 3284 consumed smokeless tobacco only (26.8%), and 3348 consumed both (27.4%). Overall, 71% of the households reported expenditure on tobacco (smoking and/or smokeless) and were considered any-tobacco use households. Our results indicate that after controlling for household expenditure, household size, household child to adult ratio, place of residence (urban/rural), and region fixed effects, any-tobacco households consumed significantly lower amounts (g/ day) of milk and dairy products (β = -17.11, p<0.01) and oil/fat (β = -10.30, p<0.01) compared to tobacco non-use households (β: adjusted mean difference in food amount g/day/household). Conversely, consumption of cereal grains (β = 152.46, p<0.0001) and sugar (β = 8.16, p<0.0001) were significantly higher among any-tobacco households compared to non-tobacco households. We observed similar patterns for smoking-only, smokeless-only, and dual tobacco product households.

Conclusions:
Evidence of dietary differences between tobacco-use and non-use households may play an important role in developing strategies to address poor diet and malnutrition among tobacco-use households in a developing country like Bangladesh. This study provides one of the first reports addressing diet in relation to tobacco use from a developing country, particularly using nationally representative data. The finding that tobacco-use households have poorer dietary consumption than non-use households suggests that it is important to address tobacco use in the context of nutrition and development programs in low-income environments.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none was reported.
FUNDING
There was no source of funding for this research.
AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS
All authors participated in the development of the study plan and analysis, interpretation of results, and the writing of the paper.
PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW
Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
 
REFERENCES (21)
1.
de Castro JM, Taylor T. Smoking status relationships with the food and fluid intakes of free-living humans. Nutrition. 2008;24(2):109-119. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2007.10.005
 
2.
Morabia A, Wynder EL. Dietary habits of smokers, people who never smoked, and exsmokers. Am. J Clin. Nutr. 1990;52(5):933-937. doi:10.1093/ajcn/52.5.933
 
3.
Palaniappan U, Jacobs SL, O'Loughlin J, Gray-Donald K. Fruit and vegetable consumption is lower and saturated fat intake is higher among Canadians reporting smoking. J Nutr. 2001;131(7):1952-1958. doi:10.1093/jn/131.7.1952
 
4.
Phillips EL, Arnett DK, Himes JH. Differences and trends in antioxidant dietary intake in smokers and non-smokers, 1980-1992: the Minnesota Heart Survey. Ann. Epidemiol. 2000;10(7):417-423. doi:10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00064-8
 
5.
Subar AF, Harlan LC. Nutrient and food group intake by tobacco use status: the 1987 National Health Interview Survey. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.1993;686:310-321. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb39193.x
 
6.
Ma J, Hampl JS, Betts NM. Antioxidant intakes and smoking status: data from the continuing survey of food intakes by individuals 1994-1996. Am. J Clin. Nutr. 2000;71(3):774-780. doi:10.1093/ajcn/71.3.774
 
7.
Kvaavik E, Meyer HE, Tverdal A. Food habits, physical activity and body mass index in relation to smoking status in 40-42 year old Norwegian women and men. Prev. Med. 2004;38:1-5. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.09.020
 
8.
Padrao P, Lunet N, Santos AC, Barros H. Smoking, alcohol, and dietary choices: evidence from the Portuguese National Health Survey. BMC. Public Health. 2007;7(1):138. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-138
 
9.
Husain MJ, Virk-Baker M, Parascandola M, Khondker BH, Ahluwalia IB. Money gone up in smoke: the tobacco use and malnutrition status in Bangladesh. Ann Glob Health. 2017; 82(5):749-759. doi:10.1016/j.aogh.2016.07.005
 
10.
John RM. Crowding out effect of tobacco expenditure and its implications on household resource allocation in India. Soc. Sci. Med. 2008;66(6):1356-1367. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.020
 
11.
John RM, Ross H, Blecher E. Tobacco expenditures and its implications for household resource allocation in Cambodia. Tob. Control. 2012;21(3):341-346. doi:10.1136/tc.2010.042598
 
12.
Pu CY, Lan V, Chou YJ, Lan CF. The crowding-out effects of tobacco and alcohol where expenditure shares are low: analyzing expenditure data for Taiwan. Soc. Sci. Med. 2008;66(9):1979-1989. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.007
 
13.
World Health Organization. Global Adult Tobacco Survey: Bangladesh report 2009. Dhaka, Bagngladesh: Country Office for Bangladesh; 2009.
 
14.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Fund for Agricultural Development World Food Programme. The state of food insecurity in the world 2015: meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: taking stock of uneven progress. Rose, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2015.
 
15.
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Report of the Household Income & Expenditure Survey 2010. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Statistics Division, Ministry of Planning; 2011.
 
16.
World Bank. Bangladesh: household income and expenditure survey: key findings and results 2010. Washington, D.C.: World Bank; 2016.
 
17.
StataCorp.2015. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2016.
 
18.
Husain MJ, Datta BK, Virk-Baker MK, Parascandola M, Khondker BH. The crowding-out effect of tobacco expenditure on household spending patterns in Bangladesh. PloS one. 2018;13(10): e0205120. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205120
 
19.
U.S. National Cancer Institute and World Health Organization. The Economics of Tobacco and Tobacco Control. National Cancer Institute Tobacco Control Monograph 21. NIH Publication No. 16-CA-8029A. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; and Geneva, CH: World Health Organization; 2016.
 
20.
World Health Organization. Tobacco and poverty: A vicious Circle. WHO/NMH/TFI/04.01. Tobacco Free Initiative, World Health Organization, 2004. http://www.who.int/tobacco/com.... Accessed September 19, 2017.
 
21.
Padrao P, Silva-Matos C, Damasceno A, Lunet N. Association between tobacco consumption and alcohol, vegetable and fruit intake across urban and rural areas in Mozambique. J Epidemiol. Community Health. 2011;65(5):445-453. doi:10.1136/jech.2009.099440
 
eISSN:2459-3087