Short report
 
CC-BY-NC 4.0
 
 

Using air quality monitoring to reduce second-hand smoke exposure in homes: the AFRESH feasibility study

Ruaraidh Dobson 1  ,  
 
1
Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2017;3(June):117
Publish date: 2017-06-22
SUPPLEMENTARY FILES:
KEYWORDS:
TOPICS:
 
ABSTRACT:
Introduction:
Few interventions to reduce second-hand smoke in homes where children are present have been successful. A novel intervention was developed that included personal airquality feedback. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of delivering this theory-based intervention through small third-sector organisations in deprived areas within Scotland.

Material and Methods:
The setting was third-sector organisations in Scotland. Support workers used air quality monitors to give information on smoke-free homes to parents. This advice was structured around computer generated reports, co-developed with workers and target-group members. Participants received a monitor then received a report, which was discussed with a support worker. Two weeks later, the monitor was reinstalled and another report produced to evaluate success. Three participants and one support worker were interviewed afterwards to explore their experiences.

Results:
One centre out of six that were approached agreed to deliver the intervention. Four participants took part. All participants saw a decline in average concentrations of PM2.5 in their homes. In interviews, the participants and the support worker indicated that the intervention was acceptable and useful. The centres that declined to participate in the study cited a range of reasons, including a lack of staff time and perceived difficulties in recruiting members of the target population.

Conclusions:
This intervention was acceptable for the target population tested, and may help participants to create smoke-free homes, although it is not possible to generalise the results of this small study. However, the resources required for the delivery of AFRESH do not match with the resources available in third-sector organisations, despite smoke-free homes being a policy priority



CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Ruaraidh Dobson   
Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scottish Centre for Indoor Air, Child Health, Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital, Westburn Road, AB25 2ZG Aberdeen, United Kingdom
 
REFERENCES:
1. GTSS Collaborative Group. A cross country comparison of exposure to secondhand smoke among youth. Tob Control 2006;15:ii4–19. doi:10.1136/tc.2006.015685.
2. Semple S, Latif N. How long does secondhand smoke remain in household air: analysis of PM2.5 data from smokers’ homes. Nicotine Tob Res 2014;16:1365–70. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu089.
3. The Scottish Government. Creating a tobacco-free generation - a tobacco control strategy for Scotland. Edinburgh: 2013.
4. Mackay D, Haw S, Ayres JG, et al. Smoke-free Legislation and Hospitalizations for Childhood Asthma. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1139–45. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1002861.
5. Rosen LJ, Myers V, Winickoff JP, et al. Effectiveness of Interventions to Reduce Tobacco Smoke Pollution in Homes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015;12:16043–59. doi:10.3390/ijerph121215038.
6. Gorini G, Gasparrini A, Fondelli MC, et al. Second-Hand Smoke (SHS) Markers: Review of methods for monitoring exposure levels. Brussels: 2005.
7. Wilson I, Semple S, Mills LM, et al. REFRESH--reducing families’ exposure to secondhand smoke in the home: a feasibility study. Tob Control 2013;22:e8. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050212.
8. Klepeis NE, Hughes SC, Edwards RD, et al. Promoting smoke-free homes: a novel behavioral intervention using real-time audio-visual feedback on airborne particle levels. PLoS One 2013;8:e73251. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073251.
9. Marsh J, McNeill A, Lewis S, et al. Protecting children from secondhand smoke: a mixed-methods feasibility study of a novel smoke-free home intervention. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2016;2:53. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0094-7.
10. Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G. Intervention mapping: a process for developing theory- and evidence-based health education programs. Health Educ Behav 1998;25:545–63. doi: 10.1177/109019819802500502.
11. Semple S, Apsley A, MacCalman L. An inexpensive particle monitor for smoker behaviour modification in homes. Tob Control 2013;22:295–8. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050401.
12. Dobson R. AFRESH Software. 2015.Available at: http://bitbucket.org/ruaraidhd/dylosgui/ (accessed 8 June 2017).
13. Hertzog MA. Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Res Nurs Health 2008;31:180–91. doi:10.1002/nur.20247.
14. ASH Scotland. AFRESH Training. 2016. Available at: http://afresh-training.smokefreehomes.network/ (accessed 19 October 2016).
15. Office for National Statistics. Earnings and working hours. 2017. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/earningsandworkinghours (accessed 17 March 2017).
eISSN:2459-3087