CONFERENCE PROCEEDING
Smoke and mirrors: Raising awareness on tobacco industry interference
More details
Hide details
1
Smoke Free Partnership, Brussels, Belgium
Publication date: 2024-10-17
Tob. Prev. Cessation 2024;10(Supplement 1):A16
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Background:
The active phase of policymaking to strengthen tobacco legislation
in the EU has been marked by a surge in tobacco industry lobbying,
which has led to delays in releasing and adopting new legislation.
Objectives:
This panel aims to investigate the size and scope of tobacco
industry interference at the EU level during 2019-2022. Monitoring
and analyzing industry interference allows us to raise awareness
about industry lobbying among EU and national decision-makers
through publications in traditional and social media. Using Art. 5.3
FCTC and the EU Transparency Register to restart the revision
of the EU Tobacco Tax, Products, and Advertising Directives
should be prioritized by tobacco control advocacy groups.
Methods:
Since 2015 the SFP systematically tracks meetings between
tobacco industry representatives and EU policymakers in the
Commission and Parliament using the EU Transparency
Register, which includes publicly available information reported
by registered entities. While it has its limitations (i.e., MEPs
not declaring some of the meetings held with the industry, and
a lack of accountability), the Register offers data on the funds
spent by the industry on lobbying, the number of lobbyists and
consultancies employed, and the number of meetings. The SFP’s
systematic approach results in a comprehensive understanding of
the size of the tobacco industry interference in Europe.
Results:
Between 2019 and 2022 (the latest available year in the EU
Transparency Register), the industry spent nearly €60 million on
lobbying activities at the EU level. This resulted in 100 meetings
during 2019 – 2024 between tobacco industry representatives and
39 MEPs, 29 of whom have been re-elected in 2024.
Conclusions:
By uncovering the “smoke and mirrors” of the tobacco industry,
this discussion seeks to unpack best practices for monitoring
and exposing the tobacco industry’s interference in the policymaking
process to restart the revisions of key EU tobacco control
directives.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.
FUNDING